Summary: IMM: PBE allows config changes on 
opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService [#934]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 934
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel; Zoran
Pull request to: 
Affected branch(es): default(4.5)
Development branch: 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset c00c6b5c7c16ca68cc0fcdfa0847611c6fc848ee
Author: Anders Bjornerstedt <anders.bjornerst...@ericsson.com>
Date:   Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:13:11 +0200

        IMM: PBE allows config changes on 
opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService
        [#934]

        The OpenSAF IMM service object 
'opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService'
        currently has two writable config attributes:

         - opensafImmSyncBatchSize
           - longDnsAllowed

        Changes to these attributes required the PBE to be disabled. This 
because
        the PBE is both regular-OI and PBE-OI for this special object. The PBE 
used
        to reject all such requests. This ticket changes the PBE to accept
        modifications to this config object. This would result in the PBE 
getting a
        second (duplicate) callback, the first one as regular OI and the second 
one
        as PBE, resulting in the derailing and abort of the CCB. So this 
changeset
        also fixes so that modifications to the special OpenSAF IMM service 
object
        will only generate one modify callback to the PBE. The regular OI 
callback
        is discarded for this special case.

        The ticket also mentions that validation should be done. But there is no
        validation of substance to perform for the above two config attributes. 
The
        'opensafImmSyncBatchSize' can be set to whatever value the deployer 
thinks
        is appropriate. The 'longDnsAllowed' attribute is managed by logic that 
only
        cares if the value is 0/zero or not, corresponding to longDNs 
disallowed or
        allowed. So the PBE simply accepts whatever modification is proposed for
        these attributes.

        Creates or deletes of instances of the class OpensafImm are still 
rejected
        by the PBE (not changed by this changeset) and so will not be 
duplicated and
        never require validation. However, when PBE is disabled, then curently
        creates or deletes of instances of the OpensafImm class are accepted. 
That
        is a defect that will be fixed separately on the supported branches. 
This
        ticket is an enhancement and is fixed only on default(4.5).


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc        |  85 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.hh        |   2 +-
 osaf/services/saf/immsv/immpbed/immpbe_daemon.cc |  13 +--------
 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Testing the complete functionality of this patch will only be possible when 
ticket #886 (IMM: Add support for long DNs in existing IMM APIs) is fixed.

It should at least be possible to test just changing the value of 
'opensafImmSyncBatchSize'
or 'longDnsAllowed', with PBE enabled.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Change of config attributes in 'opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService' is
possible when PBE is enabled. 


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Neel.



Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to