Ack, Should we change the document to say that we support only a fixed object name "logConfig=1,safApp=safLogService"? Today, we seem to suggest that any object of the logconfig class will work!?
Mathi. ----- [email protected] wrote: > osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > diff --git a/osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c > b/osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c > --- a/osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c > +++ b/osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_imm.c > @@ -2852,7 +2852,7 @@ const void *lgs_imm_logconf_get(lgs_logc > lgs_conf_p = (lgs_conf_t *) lgs_conf; > /* Check if parameters has to be fetched from IMM */ > if (lgs_conf->logInitiated != true) { > - if (read_logsv_config_obj()) { > + if (read_logsv_config_obj() != SA_AIS_OK) { > LOG_NO("No or invalid log service configuration > object"); > read_logsv_config_environ_var(); > } else { ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
