Hi AndersBj, Reviewed the patch. Ack with following comments.
1. in this section the new readme file pushed by hans can be written README.ACCESS_CONTROL +#938 IMM Access control (4.5) +============================= +http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/938/ +See ticket for details. 2. mention of enhancement https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/35/ is not there. /Neel. On Wednesday 20 August 2014 12:59 PM, Anders Bjornerstedt wrote: > Summary: IMM: Update immsv/README to reflect all enhancements done in 4.5 > [#988] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 988 > Peer Reviewer(s): Neel; (Zoran) > Pull request to: > Affected branch(es): 4.5; default(4.6) > Development branch: > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services n > OpenSAF services y > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests n > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > > changeset 1363957909068feedd9f2bd94686bcb655b42b2b > Author: Anders Bjornerstedt <anders.bjornerst...@ericsson.com> > Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 10:00:02 +0200 > > IMM: Update immsv/README to reflect all enhancements done in 4.5 [#988] > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > osaf/services/saf/immsv/README | 201 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel