Summary: amfd: use simple encode/decode [#1544] 
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1544 
Peer Reviewer(s): AMF devs 
Pull request to: AMF maintainers
Affected branch(es): default 
Development branch: default 

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y 
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

changeset 3e9c38fb204ebd378e8e83139fab40371d1961f7
Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>
Date:   Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:32:44 +1100

        amfd: use simple encode/decode for siass [#1544]

changeset 1e915a42b3de7af1f0d6419ebc55f3f92d7dd1f1
Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>
Date:   Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:35:43 +1100

        amfd: use simple encode/decode for si_trans [#1544]


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_dec.cc                |  136 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_edu.cc                |  114 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/ckpt_enc.cc                |  138 
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------------------------------------------
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/ckpt.h             |    6 ++++
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/ckpt_edu.h         |    3 --
 osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/tests/test_ckpt_enc_dec.cc |   81 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 287 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
 <<LIST THE COMMAND LINE TOOLS/STEPS TO TEST YOUR CHANGES>>


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
 <<PASTE COMMAND OUTPUTS / TEST RESULTS>>


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
 <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y 
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Go from Idea to Many App Stores Faster with Intel(R) XDK
Give your users amazing mobile app experiences with Intel(R) XDK.
Use one codebase in this all-in-one HTML5 development environment.
Design, debug & build mobile apps & 2D/3D high-impact games for multiple OSs.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=254741911&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to