Summary: cpd: To delete the existing IMM object and create a new one when cpd creates a new checkpoint [#1765] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1765 Peer Reviewer(s): mahesh.va...@oracle.com; anders.wid...@ericsson.com Pull request to: mahesh.va...@oracle.com Affected branch(es): default, 5.0, 4.7 Development branch: 5.0
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- changeset faadfd151c3b994b1dbd88d4173109ad61e7ea50 Author: Nhat Pham <nhat.p...@dektech.com.au> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:15:18 +0700 cpd: To delete the existing IMM object and create a new one when cpd creates a new checkpoint [#1765] Problem: -------- In case a failover happens while a checkpoint is being unlinked, it might causes an unfinished unlink operation (i.e the checkpoint IMM object is not deleted). Later on, when the checkpoint is created again, it will not succeed because the CPD detects that the checkpoint IMM object existing. Fix: ---- The solution is to delete the existing checkpoint IMM object and re- create a new object during creating checkpoint process. Complete diffstat: ------------------ osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_db.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_evt.c | 6 +++--- osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c | 9 +++++++-- 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- Follow test steps described in the ticket Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- Opening checkpoint should not fail permanently. Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- - Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Find and fix application performance issues faster with Applications Manager Applications Manager provides deep performance insights into multiple tiers of your business applications. It resolves application problems quickly and reduces your MTTR. Get your free trial! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/302982198;130105516;z _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel