Hi Anders,

                                Yes, but it need to go as per sequence. If we 
have #517 (a separate thread already created), you can simply change the code 
for BAD_HANDLE.

When I have to push #517, then I need to again refactor it (for making changes 
in a separate thread).

 

Neither #517 nor #1833 fixes all problems mentioned in #1607/9, we are just 
progressing towards it.

 

Thanks

-Nagu

 

From: Anders Widell [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 19 May 2016 16:13
To: Gary Lee; Nagendra Kumar
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: add preliminary support for BAD OM handles 
[#1833]

 

I agree with Gary that the full solution (outlined in tickets [#1607] and 
[#1609]) is too big to introduce in a maintenance release (OpenSAF 5.0.1). It 
will have to wait until the next major release.

regards,
Anders Widell

On 05/19/2016 12:08 PM, Gary Lee wrote:

That is why I tried to restrict the number of retries. Handling bad handle is 
different to me between OI and OM.

I think what you did in #517 is great. But it only covers a subset of the 
places where IMM reads occur.

I don't see a feasible way of fixing this fully with threads with the 
restricted time and amount of code changes we can make for 5.0?

On 19 May 2016 7:57 PM, Nagendra Kumar HYPERLINK 
"mailto:[email protected]";<[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Gary,

                Yes, but this will make Amfnd to hang and will get created the 
same problem as mentioned in #517. Please check Amfd handling the BAD_HANDLE in 
a separate thread and the tickets Ander W has mentioned.

 

Thanks

-Nagu

 

From: Gary Lee [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 19 May 2016 15:21
To: Nagendra Kumar
Cc: HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]"[email protected]; 
HYPERLINK 
"mailto:[email protected]"[email protected];
 HYPERLINK "mailto:[email protected]"[email protected]; HYPERLINK 
"mailto:[email protected]"[email protected]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1 of 1] amfnd: add preliminary support for BAD OM handles 
[#1833]

 

Hi Nagu

I think we definitely should for the next release, but what about 5.0?

Gary

 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to