Hi Hung,

Same comments as Neelakanta.
Without #1948, the patch is incomplete.

The patch #1948 is going to be pushed, so ACK from me.

Thanks,
Zoran

-----Original Message-----
From: Hung Nguyen [mailto:hung.d.ngu...@dektech.com.au] 
Sent: den 11 augusti 2016 09:10
To: Zoran Milinkovic; reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 1] Review Request for imm: Do not revert isApplier and 
isPbe flag when timeout occurs [#1943]

Summary: imm: Do not revert isApplier and isPbe flag when timeout occurs 
[#1943] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 1943 Peer Reviewer(s): Zoran, Neel 
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): 4.7, 5.0, 5.1
Development branch: 5.1

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n


Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------


changeset 1fe934cdf3795c62dd71b89087075c6782a7d45c
Author: Hung Nguyen <hung.d.ngu...@dektech.com.au>
Date:   Thu, 11 Aug 2016 14:08:29 +0700

        imm: Do not revert isApplier and isPbe flag when timeout occurs [#1943]

        Do not revert isApplier and isPbe flag when timeout occurs.


Complete diffstat:
------------------
 osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_oi_api.c |  10 +++++++++-
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------



Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------



Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewers.


Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      n          n
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to