Hi Vu,
SC-2 standby osaflogd core dumped still occurs ( Not resolved) , the new
patch only resolved the application (/usr/bin/logtest ) Segmentation
fault on SC-1 Active.
============================================================================================================================
# gdb /usr/lib64/opensaf/osaflogd core_1487751055.osaflogd.4594 GNU gdb
(GDB) SUSE (7.3-0.6.1)
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
.......
Core was generated by `/usr/lib64/opensaf/osaflogd'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195
2195 src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc: No such file or directory.
in src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc
(gdb) bt
#0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195
#1 0x00007f97b026f960 in ckpt_decode_log_struct(lgs_cb*,
ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*, void*, void*, unsigned int (*)(edu_hdl_tag*,
edu_tkn_tag*, void*, unsigned int*, edu_buf_env_tag*, EDP_OP_TYPE,
EDU_ERR*)) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:950
#2 0x00007f97b02710dc in ckpt_decode_async_update(lgs_cb*,
ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:1086
#3 0x00007f97b0273941 in mbcsv_callback(ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:880
#4 0x00007f97af372596 in ncs_mbscv_rcv_decode () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
#5 0x00007f97af372766 in ncs_mbcsv_rcv_async_update () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
#6 0x00007f97af379370 in mbcsv_process_events () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
#7 0x00007f97af3794db in mbcsv_hdl_dispatch_all () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
#8 0x00007f97af373ce2 in mbcsv_process_dispatch_request () at
src/mbc/mbcsv_api.c:423
#9 0x00007f97b027096e in lgs_mbcsv_dispatch(unsigned int) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:327
#10 0x00007f97b024d9f2 in main () at src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc:583
(gdb) bt full
#0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195
ckpt_data_handler = {0x7f97b0270300
<ckpt_proc_initialize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b02701c0
<ckpt_proc_finalize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0270060 <ckpt_proc_agent_down(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02712f0 <ckpt_proc_log_write(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0271ab0
<ckpt_proc_open_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b026fe80 <ckpt_proc_close_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0272380 <ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0274800
<ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v2(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0274e10 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v3(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02754f0 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v5(lgs_cb*, void*)>}
#1 0x00007f97b026f960 in ckpt_decode_log_struct(lgs_cb*,
ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*, void*, void*, unsigned int (*)(edu_hdl_tag*,
edu_tkn_tag*, void*, unsigned int*, edu_buf_env_tag*, EDP_OP_TYPE,
EDU_ERR*)) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:950
ckpt_data_handler = {0x7f97b0270300
<ckpt_proc_initialize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b02701c0
<ckpt_proc_finalize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0270060 <ckpt_proc_agent_down(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02712f0 <ckpt_proc_log_write(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0271ab0
<ckpt_proc_open_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b026fe80 <ckpt_proc_close_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0272380 <ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0274800
<ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v2(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0274e10 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v3(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02754f0 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v5(lgs_cb*, void*)>}
#2 0x00007f97b02710dc in ckpt_decode_async_update(lgs_cb*,
ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:1086
ckpt_data_handler = {0x7f97b0270300
<ckpt_proc_initialize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b02701c0
<ckpt_proc_finalize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0270060 <ckpt_proc_agent_down(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02712f0 <ckpt_proc_log_write(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0271ab0
<ckpt_proc_open_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b026fe80 <ckpt_proc_close_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0272380 <ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0274800
<ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v2(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0274e10 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v3(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02754f0 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v5(lgs_cb*, void*)>}
#3 0x00007f97b0273941 in mbcsv_callback(ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:880
ckpt_data_handler = {0x7f97b0270300
<ckpt_proc_initialize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b02701c0
<ckpt_proc_finalize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0270060 <ckpt_proc_agent_down(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02712f0 <ckpt_proc_log_write(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0271ab0
<ckpt_proc_open_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b026fe80 <ckpt_proc_close_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0272380 <ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0274800
<ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v2(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0274e10 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v3(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02754f0 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v5(lgs_cb*, void*)>}
#4 0x00007f97af372596 in ncs_mbscv_rcv_decode () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
mbcsv_init_process_req_func = {0x7f97af373630
<mbcsv_process_initialize_request>, 0x7f97af374f10
<mbcsv_process_get_sel_obj_request>,
0x7f97af373be0 <mbcsv_process_dispatch_request>,
0x7f97af373af0 <mbcsv_process_finalize_request>, 0x7f97af373cf0
<mbcsv_process_open_request>,
0x7f97af374050 <mbcsv_process_close_request>, 0x7f97af3741e0
<mbcsv_process_chg_role_request>, 0x7f97af3744c0
<mbcsv_process_snd_ckpt_request>,
0x7f97af3747d0 <mbcsv_process_snd_ntfy_request>,
0x7f97af374970 <mbcsv_process_snd_data_req>, 0x7f97af373930
<mbcsv_process_get_request>,
0x7f97af374bd0 <mbcsv_process_set_request>}
#5 0x00007f97af372766 in ncs_mbcsv_rcv_async_update () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
mbcsv_init_process_req_func = {0x7f97af373630
<mbcsv_process_initialize_request>, 0x7f97af374f10
<mbcsv_process_get_sel_obj_request>,
0x7f97af373be0 <mbcsv_process_dispatch_request>,
0x7f97af373af0 <mbcsv_process_finalize_request>, 0x7f97af373cf0
<mbcsv_process_open_request>,
0x7f97af374050 <mbcsv_process_close_request>, 0x7f97af3741e0
<mbcsv_process_chg_role_request>, 0x7f97af3744c0
<mbcsv_process_snd_ckpt_request>,
0x7f97af3747d0 <mbcsv_process_snd_ntfy_request>,
0x7f97af374970 <mbcsv_process_snd_data_req>, 0x7f97af373930
<mbcsv_process_get_request>,
0x7f97af374bd0 <mbcsv_process_set_request>}
#6 0x00007f97af379370 in mbcsv_process_events () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#7 0x00007f97af3794db in mbcsv_hdl_dispatch_all () from
/usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#8 0x00007f97af373ce2 in mbcsv_process_dispatch_request () at
src/mbc/mbcsv_api.c:423
mbcsv_init_process_req_func = {0x7f97af373630
<mbcsv_process_initialize_request>, 0x7f97af374f10
<mbcsv_process_get_sel_obj_request>,
0x7f97af373be0 <mbcsv_process_dispatch_request>,
0x7f97af373af0 <mbcsv_process_finalize_request>, 0x7f97af373cf0
<mbcsv_process_open_request>,
0x7f97af374050 <mbcsv_process_close_request>, 0x7f97af3741e0
<mbcsv_process_chg_role_request>, 0x7f97af3744c0
<mbcsv_process_snd_ckpt_request>,
0x7f97af3747d0 <mbcsv_process_snd_ntfy_request>,
0x7f97af374970 <mbcsv_process_snd_data_req>, 0x7f97af373930
<mbcsv_process_get_request>,
0x7f97af374bd0 <mbcsv_process_set_request>}
#9 0x00007f97b027096e in lgs_mbcsv_dispatch(unsigned int) () at
src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:327
ckpt_data_handler = {0x7f97b0270300
<ckpt_proc_initialize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b02701c0
<ckpt_proc_finalize_client(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0270060 <ckpt_proc_agent_down(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02712f0 <ckpt_proc_log_write(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0271ab0
<ckpt_proc_open_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b026fe80 <ckpt_proc_close_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0272380 <ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*)>, 0x7f97b0274800
<ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v2(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b0274e10 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v3(lgs_cb*, void*)>,
0x7f97b02754f0 <ckpt_proc_lgs_cfg_v5(lgs_cb*, void*)>}
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#10 0x00007f97b024d9f2 in main () at src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc:583
usr1_sel_obj = {raise_obj = -1, rmv_obj = -1}
_lgs_cb = {mds_hdl = 65547, mds_role = V_DEST_RL_STANDBY, vaddr
= 11, log_version = {releaseCode = 65 'A', majorVersion = 2 '\002',
minorVersion = 2 '\002'}, client_tree = {
root_node = {bit = -1, left = 0x7f97b04cf1b0, right =
0x7f97b04a2418, key_info = 0x7f97b04b7bd0 ""}, params = {key_size = 4},
n_nodes = 8}, comp_name = {_opaque = {46, 24947,
17254, 28015, 15728, 20300, 11335, 24947, 21350, 15733,
17235, 12845, 29484, 26209, 26451, 12861, 11342, 24947, 16742, 28784,
20285, 25968, 21358, 17985,
0 <repeats 105 times>}}, amf_hdl = 4288675841,
amfSelectionObject = 15, amf_invocation_id = 0, is_quiesced_set = false,
immOiHandle = 554050912783, immSelectionObject = 21,
clmSelectionObject = 17, clm_hdl = 4279238657, ha_state =
SA_AMF_HA_STANDBY, last_client_id = 208, async_upd_cnt = 743, ckpt_state
= COLD_SYNC_IDLE, mbcsv_hdl = 4293918753,
mbcsv_sel_obj = 23, mbcsv_ckpt_hdl = 4292870177,
mbcsv_peer_version = 7, edu_hdl = {is_inited = true, tree = {root_node =
{bit = -1, left = 0x7f97b04cf2e0,
right = 0x7f97b04a25b8, key_info = 0x7f97b04b7d40 ""},
params = {key_size = 8}, n_nodes = 12}, to_version = 1},
fully_initialized = true, lga_down_list_head = 0x0,
lga_down_list_tail = 0x0, clm_init_sel_obj = {raise_obj = -1,
rmv_obj = -1}, nid_started = true, scAbsenceAllowed = 900,
lgs_recovery_state = LGS_NORMAL}
nfds = 7
fds = {{fd = 19, events = 1, revents = 0}, {fd = 15, events =
1, revents = 0}, {fd = 23, events = 1, revents = 1}, {fd = 13, events =
1, revents = 0}, {fd = -1, events = 1,
revents = 0}, {fd = 17, events = 1, revents = 0}, {fd = 21,
events = 1, revents = 0}}
mbox_msgs = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
lgs_cb = 0x7f97b04a2400
mbox_low = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
lgs_mbox_init_mutex = {__data = {__lock = 0, __count = 0,
__owner = 0, __nusers = 0, __kind = 0, __spins = 0, __list = {__prev =
0x0, __next = 0x0}},
__size = '\000' <repeats 39 times>, __align = 0}
lgs_mbx = 4291821569
mbox_high = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}
mbox_full = {false, false, false, false, false}
(gdb)
(gdb)
Feb 22 13:40:55 SC-2 osafimmnd[4584]: NO Ccb 131 COMMITTED
(immcfg_SC-1_18714)
Feb 22 13:40:56 SC-2 osafamfnd[4634]: NO
'safComp=LOG,safSu=SC-2,safSg=2N,safApp=OpenSAF' faulted due to
'avaDown' : Recovery is 'nodeFailfast'
Feb 22 13:40:56 SC-2 osafamfnd[4634]: ER
safComp=LOG,safSu=SC-2,safSg=2N,safApp=OpenSAF Faulted due to:avaDown
Recovery is:nodeFailfast
Feb 22 13:40:56 SC-2 osafamfnd[4634]: Rebooting OpenSAF NodeId = 131599
EE Name = , Reason: Component faulted: recovery is node failfast,
OwnNodeId = 131599, SupervisionTime = 60
Feb 22 13:40:56 SC-2 opensaf_reboot: Rebooting local node; timeout=60
============================================================================================================================
On 2/22/2017 12:23 PM, A V Mahesh wrote:
> Hi Vu,
>
> On 2/22/2017 12:19 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> [Vu] I has sent you 02 patches. There is code change in osaflogd code that
>> fix the coredump you have observed.
>> The other one is test code that fix the logtest coredump.
> Ok I will re-test , and update you .
>
> -AVM
>
> On 2/22/2017 12:19 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi Mahehs,
>>
>> See my reply inline, [Vu].
>>
>> Regards, Vu
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 1:36 PM
>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>;
>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative
>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4
>>>
>>> Hi Vu,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/22/2017 11:52 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>> Hi Mahesh,
>>>>
>>>> Have a code fault in uml test, and other one in checkpoint.
>>> [AVM] This is Normal Suse 11 VM ( not UML).
>>>> I have just updated the code. Please re-apply for #3 and #4 patches.
>>> [AVM] is these new patch has function changes or only test code changes ?
>> [Vu] I has sent you 02 patches. There is code change in osaflogd code that
>> fix the coredump you have observed.
>> The other one is test code that fix the logtest coredump.
>>>> Note that, test case #14 of suite 17 should be run on active node,
>>> otherwise
>>>> getting failed.
>>> [AVM] Segmentation fault of /usr/bin/logtest Not a big issue ,
>>> we need to debug why osaflogd core dumped and it is critical
>> [Vu] I found the problem. You can try with the new one to see if the
>> coredump is still there or not.
>>>> I will put condition check to that test case later.
>>> -AVM
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards, Vu
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 12:16 PM
>>>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>;
>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative
>>>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Vu,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks ,
>>>>>
>>>>> While testing /usr/bin/logtest , SC-2 standby osaflogd core dumped
>> and
>>>>> /usr/bin/logtest on SC-1 Active
>>>>> got Segmentation fault , am I missing any other patch ( i am using
>>>>> devel published patch only )
>>>>>
>>>>> Following patches i am using :
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed)
>>>>> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet)
>>>>> 3) #2258 (v4, sent by Vu, but not yet pushed yet)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>> ========================================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Core was generated by `/usr/lib64/opensaf/osaflogd'.
>>>>> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
>>>>> #0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at
>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195
>>>>> 2195 src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc: No such file or directory.
>>>>> in src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc
>>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>>> #0 ckpt_proc_cfg_stream(lgs_cb*, void*) () at
>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:2195
>>>>> #1 0x00007f12c3e22960 in ckpt_decode_log_struct(lgs_cb*,
>>>>> ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*, void*, void*, unsigned int (*)(edu_hdl_tag*,
>>>>> edu_tkn_tag*, void*, unsigned int*, edu_buf_env_tag*, EDP_OP_TYPE,
>>>>> EDU_ERR*)) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:950
>>>>> #2 0x00007f12c3e240dc in ckpt_decode_async_update(lgs_cb*,
>>>>> ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:1086
>>>>> #3 0x00007f12c3e26941 in mbcsv_callback(ncs_mbcsv_cb_arg*) () at
>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:880
>>>>> #4 0x00007f12c2f25596 in ncs_mbscv_rcv_decode () from
>>>>> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
>>>>> #5 0x00007f12c2f25766 in ncs_mbcsv_rcv_async_update () from
>>>>> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
>>>>> #6 0x00007f12c2f2c370 in mbcsv_process_events () from
>>>>> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
>>>>> #7 0x00007f12c2f2c4db in mbcsv_hdl_dispatch_all () from
>>>>> /usr/lib/../lib64/libopensaf_core.so.0
>>>>> #8 0x00007f12c2f26ce2 in mbcsv_process_dispatch_request () at
>>>>> src/mbc/mbcsv_api.c:423
>>>>> #9 0x00007f12c3e2396e in lgs_mbcsv_dispatch(unsigned int) () at
>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc:327
>>>>> #10 0x00007f12c3e009f2 in main () at src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc:583
>>>>> (gdb)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>> ========================================
>>>>>
>>>>> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Invalid error reported
>>>>> implementer 'safLogService', Ccb 161 will be aborted
>>>>> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Ccb 161 aborted in
>>> COMPLETED
>>>>> processing (validation)
>>>>> Feb 22 10:37:06 SC-1 osafimmnd[4020]: NO Ccb 161 ABORTED
>>> (immcfg_SC-
>>>>> 1_5394)
>>>>> Add values Fail
>>>>>
>>>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>>> 0x000055555556929a in read_and_compare.isra.7 () at
>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:1891
>>>>> 1891 src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c: No such file or directory.
>>>>> in src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c
>>>>> (gdb) Feb 22 10:37:07 SC-1 sshd[5298]: Accepted keyboard-
>>> interactive/pam
>>>>> for root from 10.176.178.22 port 51945 ssh2
>>>>> bt
>>>>> #0 0x000055555556929a in read_and_compare.isra.7 () at
>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:1891
>>>>> #1 0x0000555555569bbb in
>>>>> check_logRecordDestinationConfigurationEmpty
>>>>> () at src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c:2179
>>>>> #2 0x0000555555573495 in run_test_case ()
>>>>> #3 0x0000555555573934 in test_run ()
>>>>> #4 0x000055555555c7cd in main () at src/log/apitest/logtest.c:569
>>>>> (gdb)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>> ========================================
>>>>>
>>>>> -AVM
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/22/2017 9:48 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Mahesh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I send them in attachment instead, and name them in the order.
>>>>>> I just pull the latest code, and apply them without getting any hunk
>>>> error.
>>>>>> Please try with them, and let me know if you see any problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards, Vu
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 11:09 AM
>>>>>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>;
>>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative
>>>>>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Vu,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I did follow that still i get Hunk #2 FAILED even on today's staging
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>>>> ==================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2293
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/Makefile.am
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 33 (offset 1 line).
>>>>>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 183 (offset 1 line).
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/file_descriptor.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/file_descriptor.h
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/tests/unix_socket_test.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/unix_client_socket.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/unix_server_socket.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/unix_socket.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/base/unix_socket.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-1
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 71 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147.
>>>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml.rej
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 35 (offset -5 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 705.
>>>>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 971.
>>>>>>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc.rej
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.h
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 304.
>>>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h.rej
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
>>>>>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 235 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 877.
>>>>>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1273 (offset -20 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #5 succeeded at 1404 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #6 succeeded at 1449 (offset -20 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #7 succeeded at 2032 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #8 FAILED at 2181.
>>>>>>> Hunk #9 succeeded at 2271 (offset -54 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #10 succeeded at 2387 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #11 succeeded at 2377 (offset -54 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #12 succeeded at 2478 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #13 succeeded at 2684 (offset -54 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #14 succeeded at 2821 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> 3 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc.rej
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v5.cc
>>>>>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 133 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_stream.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_stream.h
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_util.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-2
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 180 (offset -3 lines).
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1923.
>>>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 1979.
>>>>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 2067.
>>>>>>> Hunk #4 FAILED at 2094.
>>>>>>> 4 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c.rej
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# patch -p1 <2258-3
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am
>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 80 (offset -1 lines).
>>>>>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 217 (offset -2 lines).
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/tests/Makefile
>>>>>>> patching file src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]# vi
>>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c.rej
>>>>>>> [root@dhcp-hyd-scp-5fl-10-176-177-96 staging]#
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>>>> ========================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -AVM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2/21/2017 3:53 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi Mahesh,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I has mentioned in below:
>>>>>>>>>> To run the test, this patch has dependent on following
>> patches:
>>>>>>>>>> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed)
>>>>>>>>>> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet)
>>>>>>>> So, you need to apply #2293 first, then #2258 which sent by Lennart
>>>>>>>> yesterday, then mine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards, Vu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 5:10 PM
>>>>>>>>> To: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>;
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0 of 3] Review Request for log: add alternative
>>>>>>>>> destinations of log records [#2258] V4
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Vu,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is this applies on top of log #2146 - V4 , I see both #tickets
>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> version changes ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> in which order i need to apply ( #2146 & #2258 ) or (#2258 &
>>>>>> #2146).
>>> =========================================================
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/Makefile.am
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 72.
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 120.
>>>>>>>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>> src/log/Makefile.am.rej
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 147.
>>>>>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml.rej
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 35 (offset -5 lines).
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 705.
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 971.
>>>>>>>>> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc.rej
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_config.h
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 304.
>>>>>>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h.rej
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h
>>>>>>>>> patching file src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 30 with fuzz 2 (offset 2 lines).
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #3 succeeded at 1282 (offset 45 lines).
>>>>>>>>> Hunk #4 succeeded at 1300 (offset 2 lines).
>>>>>>>>> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc.rej
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>> ==============================================================
>>>>>>>>> ===
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -AVM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 2/21/2017 3:03 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Summary: log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258]
>>>>>>>>>> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2258
>>>>>>>>>> Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Canh, Mahesh
>>>>>>>>>> Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>>
>>>>>>>>>> Affected branch(es): Default
>>>>>>>>>> Development branch: Default
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Impacted area Impact y/n
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Docs n
>>>>>>>>>> Build system n
>>>>>>>>>> RPM/packaging n
>>>>>>>>>> Configuration files n
>>>>>>>>>> Startup scripts n
>>>>>>>>>> SAF services n
>>>>>>>>>> OpenSAF services y
>>>>>>>>>> Core libraries n
>>>>>>>>>> Samples n
>>>>>>>>>> Tests y
>>>>>>>>>> Other n
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
>>>>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To run the test, this patch has dependent on following
>> patches:
>>>>>>>>>> 1) #2293 (sent by Anders Widel, but not yet pushed)
>>>>>>>>>> 2) #2258 (v2, sent by Lennart, but not yet pushed yet)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> changeset d74aaf3025c99cade3165a15831124548f4d85bd
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:36:00 +0700
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here are major info, detailed info will be added to PR doc
>>>> soon. 1)
>>>>>>>>> Add
>>>>>>>>>> attribute "saLogRecordDestination" to log stream. 2) Add
>>>> Local
>>>>>>>>> socket
>>>>>>>>>> destintion handler 3) Integrate into first increment made by
>>>> Lennart
>>>>>>>>>> changeset 4bae27a478c235df3058f43c92d3a5483233b01d
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:07:09 +0700
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> log: add UML test case to verify alternative destination
>>>> [#2258]
>>>>>>>>>> Major changes: 1) Modify Lennart's test cases because
>>>> enhancing
>>>>>>>>> destination
>>>>>>>>>> configuration validation rules. 2) Add test suite #17 to
>>>> verify
>>>>>>>>> alternative
>>>>>>>>>> destination
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> changeset bc375725fed22bb4f8cb3ae3df5f96fb9d281efb
>>>>>>>>>> Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:22:13 +0700
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> log: add unit tests to verify interfaces provided by
>>>> destination
>>>>>>>>> handler
>>>>>>>>>> [#2258]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Unit tests to verify major interfaces: 1) CfgDestination()
>>>> 2)
>>>>>>>>>> WriteToDestination()
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Added Files:
>>>>>>>>>> ------------
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/tests/Makefile
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Complete diffstat:
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/Makefile | 4 +
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/Makefile.am | 31 +++++-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c | 8 +-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c | 483
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml | 7 +-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc | 169
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_config.h | 3 +-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc | 707
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h | 576
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc | 33 ++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc | 202
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc | 8 +
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 103
>> ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h | 6 +-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v5.cc | 10 +
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.cc | 177
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v7.h | 67 +++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_stream.cc | 60 +++++++++++-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_stream.h | 16 +++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc | 63 ++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/logd/lgs_util.h | 11 +-
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/tests/Makefile | 20 +++
>>>>>>>>>> src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc | 209
>>>>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>>>> 23 files changed, 2896 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Testing Commands:
>>>>>>>>>> -----------------
>>>>>>>>>> Run UML test suite #17
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Testing, Expected Results:
>>>>>>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> All test passed
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Conditions of Submission:
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Arch Built Started Linux distro
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> mips n n
>>>>>>>>>> mips64 n n
>>>>>>>>>> x86 n n
>>>>>>>>>> x86_64 n n
>>>>>>>>>> powerpc n n
>>>>>>>>>> powerpc64 n n
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Reviewer Checklist:
>>>>>>>>>> -------------------
>>>>>>>>>> [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any
>>>>>>> checkmarks!]
>>>>>>>>>> Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many
>> blank
>>>>>>>> entries
>>>>>>>>>> that need proper data filled in.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and
>>>>>> push.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your
>>>>>>>>> headers/comments/text.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your
>>>>>> commits.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your
>>>> comments/files
>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build
>>>>>> tests.
>>>>>>>>>> Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be
>>>>>>> removed.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace
>>>>>>> crimes
>>>>>>>>>> like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and
>>> other
>>>>>>>>>> cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate
>>>>>> commits.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks;
>> there
>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> too much content into a single commit.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits
>>> etc)
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been
>>> sent;
>>>>>>>>>> Instead you should place your content in a public tree to
>> be
>>>>>>>> pulled.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as
>>>>>>> threaded
>>>>>>>>>> commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear
>>>>>>>> indication
>>>>>>>>>> of what has changed between each re-send.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of
>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> comments and change requests that were proposed in the
>>>> initial
>>>>>>>> review.
>>>>>>>>>> ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email
>> etc)
>>>>>>>>>> ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time;
>>> confusing
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> the threaded patch review.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any
>>>>>>> results
>>>>>>>>>> for in-service upgradability test.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your
>>> patch
>>>>>>> series
>>>>>>>>>> do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
>>>>>>>>>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
