Hi Vu, ACK with following for All patch list
Note : default functionality tested , Enhancement specific functionality not tested. - consider optimizing encoding function uint32_t edp_ed_open_stream_rec() - Update PR document - Is multiple alternative destinations allowed concurrently ? -AVM On 2/24/2017 1:22 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote: > Summary: log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258] > Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2258 > Peer Reviewer(s): Lennart, Canh, Mahesh > Pull request to: <<LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE>> > Affected branch(es): Default > Development branch: Default > > -------------------------------- > Impacted area Impact y/n > -------------------------------- > Docs n > Build system n > RPM/packaging n > Configuration files n > Startup scripts n > SAF services y > OpenSAF services n > Core libraries n > Samples n > Tests y > Other n > > > Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): > --------------------------------------------- > These patches have dependent on following patches > which are in review status, but not pushed yet. > 1) #2293 sent by Anders (which has updated on base::UnixClientSocket class) > 2) #2266 sent by Anders (which provide base::Hash function) > > > changeset 528106c63724091c3e97463e0bcdb9d5f711ea0d > Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:37:32 +0700 > > log: add alternative destinations of log records [#2258] > > Here are major info, detailed info will be added to PR doc soon. 1) Add > attribute "saLogRecordDestination" to log stream. 2) Add Local socket > destintion handler 3) Add NILDEST destination type 4) Integrate into > first > increment made by Lennart > > changeset 614b5385f5d893639c315399f840747a1cbc194b > Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:07:09 +0700 > > log: add UML test case to verify alternative destination [#2258] > > Major changes: 1) Modify Lennart's test cases because enhancing > destination > configuration validation rules. 2) Add test suite #18 to verify > alternative > destination > > changeset a1ea6eac47505b91d3e3bcd41d433add9b808ec8 > Author: Vu Minh Nguyen <vu.m.ngu...@dektech.com.au> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:22:13 +0700 > > log: add unit tests to verify outer interfaces [#2258] > > Unit tests to verify outer interfaces: 1) CfgDestination() 2) > WriteToDestination() 3) GetDestinationStatus() > > > Added Files: > ------------ > src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c > src/log/logd/lgs_common.h > src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc > src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h > src/log/logd/lgs_nildest.cc > src/log/logd/lgs_nildest.h > src/log/logd/lgs_unixsock_dest.cc > src/log/logd/lgs_unixsock_dest.h > src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc > src/log/tests/Makefile > > > Complete diffstat: > ------------------ > src/log/Makefile | 4 + > src/log/Makefile.am | 39 +++++++++- > src/log/apitest/tet_LogOiOps.c | 10 +- > src/log/apitest/tet_cfg_destination.c | 509 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/config/logsv_classes.xml | 7 +- > src/log/logd/lgs_common.h | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_config.cc | 173 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > src/log/logd/lgs_config.h | 3 +- > src/log/logd/lgs_dest.cc | 409 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_dest.h | 294 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_evt.cc | 32 ++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_imm.cc | 211 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > src/log/logd/lgs_main.cc | 11 ++- > src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.cc | 193 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv.h | 1 + > src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v5.cc | 11 +++ > src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.cc | 70 ++++++++++++++++++- > src/log/logd/lgs_mbcsv_v6.h | 30 ++++++- > src/log/logd/lgs_nildest.cc | 153 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_nildest.h | 72 +++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_stream.cc | 62 ++++++++++++++++- > src/log/logd/lgs_stream.h | 16 ++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_unixsock_dest.cc | 343 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_unixsock_dest.h | 245 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_util.cc | 34 +++++++++ > src/log/logd/lgs_util.h | 11 ++- > src/log/tests/Makefile | 20 +++++ > src/log/tests/lgs_dest_test.cc | 385 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 28 files changed, 3308 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-) > > > Testing Commands: > ----------------- > 1) Unittest: > Run "make check". > 2) apitest > Run test suite #18, or whole tests > > > Testing, Expected Results: > -------------------------- > All test PASSED > > > Conditions of Submission: > ------------------------- > <<HOW MANY DAYS BEFORE PUSHING, CONSENSUS ETC>> > > > Arch Built Started Linux distro > ------------------------------------------- > mips n n > mips64 n n > x86 n n > x86_64 n n > powerpc n n > powerpc64 n n > > > Reviewer Checklist: > ------------------- > [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] > > > Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): > > ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries > that need proper data filled in. > > ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. > > ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header > > ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. > > ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. > > ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. > > ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files > (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) > > ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. > Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. > > ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. > > ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes > like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. > > ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other > cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. > > ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is > too much content into a single commit. > > ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) > > ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; > Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. > > ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded > commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. > > ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication > of what has changed between each re-send. > > ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the > comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. > > ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc) > > ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the > the threaded patch review. > > ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results > for in-service upgradability test. > > ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series > do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
