Summary: plm: add missing test cases in saPlmFinalize() and saPlmDispatch() 
api's of plm apitest [#2938]
Review request for Ticket(s): 2938-1
Peer Reviewer(s):Alex, Mathi 
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-2938-1
Base revision: f8a6848a1cdbff0b518c3db951e4689e260226c7
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/meenatk-hasoln/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            n
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   y
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
*** EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE ***

revision fcc87d5fc5694b5a7369960d59f433fdec4043bf
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:59:02 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmReadinessTrack() api of plm apitest [#2938]



revision 913cf89533d1a44ed3afa2d54a8c92b466368463
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:58:02 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmEntityGroupAdd() api of plm apitest [#2938]



revision 79c29b4fcd1fda676b76a08d8d6a18ef0f1a0a47
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:56:09 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmEntityGroupRemove() api of plm apitest 
[#2938]



revision 6b91a2485e087f454de603f7e5951f50bcc72f08
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:54:00 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmEntityGroupDelete() api of plm apitest 
[#2938]



revision f8621d2ad29d0855ab492f15b19422680bacda38
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:50:51 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmEntityGroupCreate() api of plm apitest 
[#2938]



revision 79f6361030f55703c525883d4f8e16d7b7905979
Author: Meenakshi TK <[email protected]>
Date:   Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:48:03 +0530

plm: add missing test cases in saPlmFinalize() and saPlmDispatch() api's of plm 
apitest [#2938]



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmDispatch.c          |  77 +++++++++++++++++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmEntityGroupAdd.c    |  42 +++++++++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmEntityGroupCreate.c |  51 +++++++++++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmEntityGroupDelete.c |  20 +++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmEntityGroupRemove.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmFinalize.c          |  10 +++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmInitialize.c        |  24 ++++++
 src/plm/apitest/test_saPlmReadinessTrack.c    |  72 ++++++++++++++++++
 8 files changed, 399 insertions(+)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
./plmtest

Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   20  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
Invalid plm handle

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   21  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
 Invalid plm handle

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   22  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
 NULL pointer to plm handle

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   23  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
  NULL pointer to plm handle

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   24  PASSED      
SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM  - NULL pointer to plm handle

Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   25  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
 NULL pointer to plm handle and invalid selection object
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   29  PASSED      SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE - 
 NULL pointer to handle


PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'    5  PASSED      saPlmEntityGroupCreate 
with plmhandle as null pointer  - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   21  PASSED      saPlmEntityGroupAdd_17 
- Add HE by passing null pointer to group handle SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   22  PASSED      saPlmEntityGroupAdd_18 
- Add HE by passing invalid pointer to entity names SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   23  PASSED      saPlmEntityGroupAdd_19 
- Add HE by passing invalid entityNamesNumber SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM


PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   41  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupRemove_19 to pass a invalid group handle SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   42  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupRemove_20 to pass invalid pointer to entity names 
SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   43  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupRemove_21 to pass invalid pointer to entity names and invalid 
entityNamesNumber SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   44  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupRemove_22 to pass invalid group handle and invalid pointer to 
entity names SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   45  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupRemove_23 to pass invalid group handle and entityNamesNumber 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   49  PASSED      
saPlmEntityGroupDelete_04 with null pointer to grouphandle - 
SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'7' Expected value:'7'   44  PASSED
saPlmReadinessNotificationFree with invalid param - SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM

PLMSV:PLMA:ON
Received value:'9' Expected value:'9'   45  PASSED
saPlmReadinessNotificationFree with bad handle - SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_HANDLE
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from maintainers

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.



_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to