Summary: msgd: narrow ntf filter [#3034]
Review request for Ticket(s): 3034
Peer Reviewer(s): nagu
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-3034
Base revision: d07d6f3363fae78d579bbb37366cc5b814d35f0b
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/trguitar/review
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
revision a229f13decdbd9adf16328e322f68fb2647adcf0
Author: Alex Jones <ajo...@rbbn.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 11:04:52 -0400
msgd: narrow ntf filter [#3034]
Can see the following log during controller switchover with lots of AMF
objects in the config: saNtfDispatch failed: 6.
msgd is listening for every NTF notification which occurs in the system. If
there is a failover there can be a large number of notifications which get
generated.
msgd should setup the filter when it registers with NTF to only get
notifications for the ones it cares about.
Complete diffstat:
------------------
src/msg/msgd/mqd_ntf.cc | 47 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
1) Setup 3-node cluster (2 controllers, 1 payload)
2) create 3 SUs and 5 components in each SU
3) Failfast the active controller, and hold opensaf_reboot for 10 seconds
so there is no active for a few seconds
4) let failover of controller continue
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Don't see "saNtfDispatch failed: 6" in logs.
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
May 13, or ack from developer.
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 y y
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of
Ribbon Communications Inc. that
is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient.
Any review, disclosure, reliance or
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies,
including any attachments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
