Summary: amfnd: fix SaAmfCSITransitionDescriptorT for set csi callback [#3044]
Review request for Ticket(s): 3044
Peer Reviewer(s): Hans, Nagu, Gary
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-3044
Base revision: 3895c7a88bdb3c6f86da1083ea0fd9e2cd642d01
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/trguitar/review

--------------------------------
Impacted area       Impact y/n
--------------------------------
 Docs                    n
 Build system            n
 RPM/packaging           n
 Configuration files     n
 Startup scripts         n
 SAF services            y
 OpenSAF services        n
 Core libraries          n
 Samples                 n
 Tests                   n
 Other                   n

NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers

Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------

revision 50ccd2d891c6dcf2d1b83870c7593f0ccdb79bac
Author: Alex Jones <ajo...@rbbn.com>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jun 2019 09:08:23 -0400

amfnd: fix SaAmfCSITransitionDescriptorT for set csi callback [#3044]

SaAmfCSITransitionDescriptorT is not set properly when the csi set callback is
received.

amfnd is receiving the correct descriptor from amfd, but is never updating the
internal csis.

Update the internal csis when amfd sends a csi change.



Complete diffstat:
------------------
 samples/amf/sa_aware/amf_demo.c |   9 ++++
 src/amf/amfnd/sidb.cc           | 100 +++++++++++++---------------------------
 tools/cluster_sim_uml/build_uml |   4 +-
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)


Testing Commands:
-----------------
Check the csi_set callback to make sure the transition descriptor is set
properly.


Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
Transition descriptor should be set according to the AMF 4.0 spec.


Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
June 11, or ack from developer.

Arch      Built     Started    Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips        n          n
mips64      n          n
x86         n          n
x86_64      y          y
powerpc     n          n
powerpc64   n          n


Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]


Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):

___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
    that need proper data filled in.

___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.

___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header

___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.

___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.

___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.

___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
    (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)

___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
    Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.

___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.

___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
    like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.

___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
    cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.

___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
    too much content into a single commit.

___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)

___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
    Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.

___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
    commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.

___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
    of what has changed between each re-send.

___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
    comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.

___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)

___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
    the threaded patch review.

___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
    for in-service upgradability test.

___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
    do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice: This e-mail together with any attachments may contain information of 
Ribbon Communications Inc. that
is confidential and/or proprietary for the sole use of the intended recipient.  
Any review, disclosure, reliance or
distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly 
prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender immediately and then delete all copies, 
including any attachments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel

Reply via email to