Summary: osaf: add function to return takeover request expiry time [#3029]
Review request for Ticket(s): 3029
Peer Reviewer(s): Minh, Hans
Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE ***
Affected branch(es): develop
Development branch: ticket-3029
Base revision: 4f86e371d28a385f689011a0effef8aaae65e713
Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/userid-2226215/review
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services y
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
revision 1f48477cdcd92356cd446ad81741f9373724be7c
Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:19:17 +1000
amfd: improve controller failover behavior [#3029]
If consensus service is enabled, only perform node failover
after peer controller has self-fenced
(after 2 * FMS_TAKEOVER_REQUEST_VALID_TIME seconds).
This also means if node failover delay is set to a large value,
we do not unnecesarily wait too long before failing over assignments
previously assigned to the peer controller.
Remove unused fmd_conf_file variable.
Change some LOG_ER calls to LOG_WA.
revision 5e03fc3e30920989080f6617ca404f7f60f4a8cc
Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 16:19:10 +1000
fmd: add active promotion supervision timer [#3029]
Add supervision timer so controller will reboot if it cannot obtain
consensus lock within the allocation period
(2* FMS_TAKEOVER_REQUEST_VALID_TIME).
The peer controller can then safely perform a node failover
after this period of time.
revision c2a9e9d8712952526660efe678daee39f85d1d68
Author: Gary Lee <gary....@dektech.com.au>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 15:34:36 +1000
osaf: add function to return takeover request expiry time [#3029]
Complete diffstat:
------------------
src/amf/amfd/cb.h | 1 -
src/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 4 +-
src/amf/amfd/main.cc | 1 -
src/amf/amfd/ndfsm.cc | 8 ++--
src/amf/amfd/ndproc.cc | 19 ++++++++++
src/amf/amfd/node_state.cc | 23 +++++------
src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.cc | 19 ++++++++++
src/amf/amfd/node_state_machine.h | 2 +
src/amf/amfd/proc.h | 1 +
src/fm/fmd/fm_cb.h | 2 +
src/fm/fmd/fm_main.cc | 14 ++++++-
src/fm/fmd/fm_rda.cc | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
src/osaf/consensus/consensus.cc | 4 ++
src/osaf/consensus/consensus.h | 2 +
14 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
1) Ensure a 2N application is active on standby controller,
and standy on the active controller
2) Isolate active & standby controller
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
amfd should failover 2N application only after
2 * FMS_TAKEOVER_REQUEST_VALID_TIME seconds
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from reviewer
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 y y
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-devel mailing list
Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel
