Summary: mds: fix memleak in code and test [#1860] Review request for Ticket(s): 1860 Peer Reviewer(s): Minh, Vu, Gary Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-1860 Base revision: 1aaa913e028197cc4fd6cd77023b3830388cd9c9 Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/thuantr/review
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services n OpenSAF services n Core libraries y Samples n Tests y Other n NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- N/A revision 0b2d42d0a5bc8a7f69489aa6f8b4f3948b685f1d Author: thuan.tran <thuan.t...@dektech.com.au> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 13:41:53 +0700 mds: fix memleak in code and test [#1860] Complete diffstat: ------------------ src/mds/apitest/mdstipc.h | 2 +- src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_api.c | 134 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ src/mds/apitest/mdstipc_conf.c | 9 ++- src/mds/mds_c_sndrcv.c | 1 + src/mds/mds_tipc_fctrl_intf.cc | 4 +- 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- N/A Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- N/A Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- ACK by reviewers Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel