Summary: imm: reboot nodes used to be different partition with coord [#2936] Review request for Ticket(s): 2936 Peer Reviewer(s): Minh, Thang, Vu Pull request to: *** LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE *** Affected branch(es): develop Development branch: ticket-2936 Base revision: d28ee50720d5e57edba6ee5c27e8b2bebb0638fa Personal repository: git://git.code.sf.net/u/thuantr/review
-------------------------------- Impacted area Impact y/n -------------------------------- Docs n Build system n RPM/packaging n Configuration files n Startup scripts n SAF services y OpenSAF services n Core libraries n Samples n Tests n Other n NOTE: Patch(es) contain lines longer than 80 characers Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above): --------------------------------------------- N/A revision 40ff2641bbfd5caf8133f9c3a256b1f3268d5f92 Author: thuan.tran <thuan.t...@dektech.com.au> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:24:47 +0700 imm: define macro for values of canBeCoord [#2936] revision c1da24ed55b18fd511acbab2e2edac9bb9073dd4 Author: thuan.tran <thuan.t...@dektech.com.au> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 16:24:47 +0700 imm: reboot nodes used to be different partition with coord [#2936] - immnd send re-introduce refresh=3 with ex-immd (active) node id. - immd set very high priority for re-introduce msg of local immnd and choose coord if re-introduce refresh=3 from local immnd. - immd reply re-intro to reboot if ex-immd is not same as ex-immd of selected coord. - immd use new INTRO_RSP_2 to checkpoint ex-immd to standby. - immnd use MDS_RED_SUBSCRIBE for immd to know active/standby immd and help detect headless in multi partition clusters rejoin. - immnd discard FEVS from unknown immd or during re-introduce to avoid immnd OUT OF ORDER restart and lost ex-immd info. - Update README.SC_ABSENCE for this new feature. - Allow to configure disable/enable this new feature. - immd standby will reboot if see two actives immd to avoid sync with wrong active. Complete diffstat: ------------------ scripts/opensaf_reboot | 1 + src/imm/README.SC_ABSENCE | 21 +++++++ src/imm/common/immsv_evt.c | 17 +++++- src/imm/common/immsv_evt.h | 15 ++++- src/imm/immd/immd.conf | 7 +++ src/imm/immd/immd.h | 10 ++++ src/imm/immd/immd_cb.h | 3 + src/imm/immd/immd_evt.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ src/imm/immd/immd_main.c | 9 +++ src/imm/immd/immd_mbcsv.c | 24 ++++++-- src/imm/immd/immd_mds.c | 17 ++++-- src/imm/immd/immd_proc.c | 26 ++++----- src/imm/immd/immd_red.h | 1 + src/imm/immd/immd_sbevt.c | 24 +++++--- src/imm/immnd/immnd_cb.h | 3 + src/imm/immnd/immnd_evt.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++------ src/imm/immnd/immnd_main.c | 2 + src/imm/immnd/immnd_mds.c | 35 ++++++++--- src/imm/immnd/immnd_proc.c | 19 +++--- 19 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) Testing Commands: ----------------- N/A Testing, Expected Results: -------------------------- N/A Conditions of Submission: ------------------------- ACK by reviewers Arch Built Started Linux distro ------------------------------------------- mips n n mips64 n n x86 n n x86_64 y y powerpc n n powerpc64 n n Reviewer Checklist: ------------------- [Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!] Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries): ___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries that need proper data filled in. ___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push. ___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header ___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable. ___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text. ___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits. ___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files (i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc) ___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests. Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing. ___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed. ___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs. ___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits. ___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is too much content into a single commit. ___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc) ___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent; Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled. ___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded commits, or place in a public tree for a pull. ___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication of what has changed between each re-send. ___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review. ___ You have a misconfigured ~/.gitconfig file (i.e. user.name, user.email etc) ___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the the threaded patch review. ___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results for in-service upgradability test. ___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual. _______________________________________________ Opensaf-devel mailing list Opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-devel