Hi,
Thanks for the quick response.

I have a follow up question please.  How difficult would it be to bring in all 
the TCP fixes you mentioned in the later releases in to 4.4.0?


thanks

-------------------
William Elliott, Senior Analyst, R&D
Netcracker Technology

+1 (407) 708-5059 | ext. 3859 | office
+1 (407) 603-3039 | home

-----Original Message-----
From: A V Mahesh [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 11:59 PM
To: William R Elliott; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [users] Multicast Recommendation

Hi William R Elliot,

We improved/fixed  considerable issue  in TCP transport since 4.4, so we 
suggest to use latest release, even it will be easy to support you with latest 
code, if you facing any  issues.

-AVM

On 3/14/2017 3:30 AM, William R Elliott wrote:
> Hello All,
> I am currently using opensaf 4.4.0 with TCP as the transport mechanism.  I'm 
> investigating the best way to use the multicast feature of opensaf since I 
> need to run an opensaf cluster broadcasting across two different subnets in a 
> production environment.  So what would be really helpful is which of the 
> following approaches would the experienced members of this forum recommend 
> and why:
> 1) Use the existing opensaf 4.4.0 multicast functionality because it is 
> robust and works very well so there’s no need going through an upgrade effort 
> and all that it involves.
>
> 2) Update to the latest version of opensaf because it is more reliable than 
> version 4.4.0's multicast functionality and would be worth the trouble of 
> going through the regression testing and upgrade effort that would be 
> required.
>
>
> thanks!
>
>
>
> -------------------
> William Elliott, Senior Analyst, R&D
> Netcracker Technology
>
> +1 (407) 708-5059 | ext. 3859 | office
> +1 (407) 603-3039 | home
>
> [https://www.netcracker.com/assets/img/netcracker-social-final.png] ƕ
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity 
> to which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or 
> privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use 
> of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
> entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received 
> this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any 
> computer.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's
> most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Opensaf-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users



________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or 
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, 
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Opensaf-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensaf-users

Reply via email to