On 16/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > > On 09/05/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 09/05/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Ludovic Rousseau wrote: > >> > > On 13/04/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > I can't find the needed file security/pam_ext.h in your patch. I > >> guess > >> > > you forgot to add --new-file when you used diff :-) > >> > > > >> > > Can you send the missing file? > >> > It's part of pam 0.99.6.2 (supplies pam_prompt). If you don't have > >> that > >> > version of pam, you won't have the pam_prompt function either. > >> > >> I see. Debian only has version 0.79. A bug #360460 has been opened to > >> have a new version in Debian. > >> > >> > I can > >> > supply a patch that will also work with older versions of pam, and use > >> > configure to determine which you have. > >> > >> That would be great. Otherwise pam_pkcs11 could not be complied on > >> Debian (and derivatives) without hacking. > > > > Any progress on this patch? > Sorry for the delay. Thanks for your patience. I haven't tested this on > a older pam implementation, but I did verify that the config stuff works > correctly by renaming pam_ext.h on my system.
Patch applied. Please, go one with the third and last patch. Regards, -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
