2007/12/5, Simon Eisenmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> while testing 2048 bit cards with various readers and various hash
> algorithms i notices that some card os cards of the same CA (in this
> case D-Trust) work different.
>
> Both require code modifications to the card-cardos opensc driver.
>
> One card is D-Trust card 2.0 2cc and the other one is 2.0 2ca. Both are
> exactly the same (same flags, same caps, same ATR ..). Only the label is
> different.
>
> Both cards can neither do RSA_PURE_SIG nor RSA_SIG. The only work with
> the raw hash value, and cannot sign with the encryption key.
>
> Though there comes the problem:
>
>  - The first card (2cc) always adds an SHA1 hash prefix
>    to the date it is going to encrypt.
>
>    It even does this when there is already a hash prefix
>    before the data. Thus for this cards it is only possible
>    to use SHA1 and to strip the SHA1 prefix (sign raw hash
>    value only). So its not possible to sign other hashes
>    than SHA1 with the 2cc card.
>
>  - The second card (2ca) does not do this, so opensc must not
>    strip the prefix. Any hash type can be signed with this card.
>
>
> I could produce a patch which supports both cards properly by doing
> string matching and adding some new flags to card os to disable certain
> parts of signature tries in card-cardos.c, but could this be the general
> solution?
>
> There should be a possibility to detect what type of data has to be sent
> to the card. Or if that is not possible, some better way to enable /
> disable code which is required for some card vendors, based on some kind
> of configuration file. I do not like to add all kinds of conditions to
> the code based of string compare to some card meta data.

Adding a configuration flag is not a really good idea. You would have
to change the configuration file if you change the card from a "ca" to
a "cc".

A dynamic/automatic support is far better (if possible).

Bye

-- 
 Dr. Ludovic Rousseau
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to