Right.
As it affect the overall operation of pkcs11-tool (C_GetSlotList is
called only once during the lifetime of the tool)
it is justified to have it as a generic option to pkcs11-tool. I'm
just not sure if adding a verbose option is the right thing to do.
If you actually use pkcs11-tool (as a human being) one often wants to
cut the unnecessary noise (e.g. 13 empty virtual slots)
So it also makes sense to have it as a shorthand option.
So pkcs11-tool -TL (--list-slots --with-tokens?) is the way I'd like
to type it. What do you think?
Similarly to the change in [3597] I'd like to change pkcs11-tool -O
for example to display all objects in all slots, unless a slot is
specified.
m.
On 06.12.2008, at 21:03, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Can you please change this implementation by removing the
> --list-token-slots and add extra parameter to --list-slots?
>
> pkcs11-tool --list-slots --slot-status={empty,token}
>
> Alon.
>
> On 11/22/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 11/22/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > wrote:
>>> Revision: 3592
>>> Author: martin
>>> Date: 2008-11-21 23:34:31 +0100 (Fri, 21 Nov 2008)
>>>
>>> Log Message:
>>> -----------
>>> Add --list-token-slots / -T to pkcs11-tool to list only slots with
>>> tokens.
>>>
>>
>>
>> I think this should be an option for --list-slots and not another
>> standalone option.
>>
>>
>> Alon.
>>
--
Martin Paljak
http://martin.paljak.pri.ee
+372.515.6495
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
