On 12/11/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can't it cause conflict? > > > What kind of conflicts? > If the DWORD type is already defined elsewhere for exemple?
No... I meant that if prototype accept portable type and code defines windows type... > > > > Or the Windows types are defined by "portable" types... ? > > > That depends on your definition of "portable". > typedef int32_t LONG; > typedef uint32_t DWORD; > > The problem is that with the "official" pcsc-lite we have: > typedef long LONG; > typedef unsigned long DWORD; > These are the same definition that are used by Microsoft on Windows. > > The problem is that Windows on 64-bits arch uses LLP64 model [1] and > Linux, Darwin (and I think any other Unix) uses the LP64 model. > > So: > On Windows 64bits a LONG is 32 bits > On Linux 64 bits a LONG is 64 bits (as a long) > On Mac OS X 64 bits a LONG is 32 bits (as a int32_t) > > I think Apple made the good choice. I could change the definitions in > pcsc-lite wintypes.h but that would break the ABI (on 64 bits > machines) and would then require a new pcsclite library version. I think a fixup to pcsc-lite is the best, as the winscard ABI is broken now. But we support all modes now, right? Thanks, Alon. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
