I had the same problem some time ago and I could not explain why ./ configure wanted to run X for me on OSX and failed. I re-ran bootstrap and everything started working again. I never investigated but I though it was just a glitch that happened because of some actions I forgot I took at some moment back in time.
m. On 04.03.2009, at 15:50, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Mittwoch 04 März 2009 14:05:34 schrieb Marc Rios Valles: >> Hi, >> >> I've been playing around the new opensc-0.11.7 and I think is not >> correct to add the m4 referents to libtool because it makes to fail >> the >> compilation in some systems. I am refering to m4/libtool.m4 and >> m4/lt*.m4 files. These files differs in one system to another and are >> putted by aclocal so are not needed. In Fedora 10 for example when >> you >> try to compile you get: > > did you only run configure, or did you run some extra commands like > aclocal, bootstrap, autoheader, automake or anything like that? > > did you enable maintainer mode in configure? > > the package process has the usual goal to allow any user to compile > opensc without needing any of those packages. so you should only > need the pkg-config tool, the packages we depend on, make and gcc > (and friends like ld, asm, etc.). > > libtool is added by the package process to the source, and the m4/ > libtool.m4 > and related files are there so autoconf knows about that. (no, I'm > no expert here, but they contain the makros so autoconf knows > how to use ./libtool I guess). > > my point of view is: > * bug fixing should be possible with editing *.c only > (yes, that doesn't work if you want to add new *.c files) > * developers should build from svn source or from "make maintainer- > clean", > have all those tools installed installed and run ./bootstrap > * people compiling opensc should not need autoconf/make/libtool/... > at all > (except for libltdl with development files and the other libraries), > and should run ./configure only (without enabling maintainer mode) > and that should work. > > which case fits your description best, and what did you exactly / > what are you > trying to do? > > I know that some distributions do strange things with autoconf based > software, > such as replacing files, re-running autoconf and so on. I'm no > expert here, > no idea why that is done, but if they modify the source, I hope they > know what > they are doing. > > Regards, Andreas > _______________________________________________ > opensc-devel mailing list > opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel -- Martin Paljak http://martin.paljak.pri.ee +372.515.6495 _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
