Hello, Viktor TARASOV wrote: > Hi, > > my general question is: > will you agree to have a little bit more of the debug messages in the > common sources ? > IMHO, it will facilitate the debugging and the comprehension of the 'how > it works'.
If it is useful, yes. > I mean, at least, to use more of the log macros ( SC_FUNC_RETURN, > SC_FUNC_CALLED and SC_TEST_RET) > instead of simple 'return SC_xxx', > to use the 'return' macro in the functions that starts from 'call' > macro, etc. Using everywhere these log macros is not reasonable. It can make the simple code too difficult, overloaded with details. But if the function is big and with complicated logic, additional detailed log will be useful. True criterion is common sence. > (Sometimes, in the sources, there is an textual duplicate of the > existing macros). What do you want to change and where? > Does it exists any rule for the assigning of the debug level for debug > messages ? I think we have to follow common sence. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
