Martin Paljak wrote: > On Mar 19, 2010, at 09:39 , Viktor TARASOV wrote: > >> Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: >> >>> I like the change with "struct foo" vs. "foo_t", but also I prefer >>> variable names in function definitions. but I'm not sure if >>> that results in problems, if people want to use different names. >>> >>> (no need to change, only meant as feedback...) >>> >>> >> My intention was to homogenize the style at least in the limit of one >> source file. >> I also like parameters in function prototypes -- this way was the shortest. >> Well, if I'm not the only one who like it, we'll gradually change it. >> > How does this behave with doxygen? There are some comments in pkcs15-init.h, > for example create_key has some doxygen comments. > Eventually having code comments (and a api doc even if it is for internal > use) is admirable. >
I'll bear in mind. -- Viktor Tarasov <viktor.tara...@opentrust.com> _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
