Le dimanche 10 octobre 2010 à 10:43 +0200, Ludovic Rousseau a écrit : > Now you can analyse each result. > And if a real problem is present explain it and propose a patch. > Of course this is the hard part of the job.
The answer to this question depends on the quality of flawfinder
reports.
If some warnings are real issues, the best would be for main OpenSC
hackers to review flawfinders warnings. This would be way faster. Also
we are close to a release.
Kind regards,
--
Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
