[email protected] skrev:

>Send opensc-devel mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of opensc-devel digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Using eID authenticate with the Feitian PKI
>      (Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE)
>   2. Re: Short form for the log message (Juan Antonio Martinez)
>   3. Re: Using eID authenticate with the Feitian PKI (Peter Stuge)
>   4. Re: Using eID authenticate with the Feitian PKI
>      (Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE)
>   5. Re: Using eID authenticate with the Feitian PKI
>      (Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE)
>   6. Re: Canonical mailing list address (Andreas Jellinghaus)
>   7. Re: Canonical mailing list address (Martin Paljak)
>   8. Re: FOSDEM 2011: february 5th and 6th (Andreas Jellinghaus)
>   9. Re: Canonical mailing list address (Peter Stuge)
>  10. Re: Canonical mailing list address (Andreas Jellinghaus)
>  11. Re: Windows 7 support for PKCS#11 => mini-driver
>      (Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 15:48:57 +0100
>From: Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE <[email protected]>
>Subject: [opensc-devel] Using eID authenticate with the Feitian PKI
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <1294152537.3110.10.ca...@acer>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>Dear Friends,
>
>Did any succeed in using eID authenticate under Windows 7 with the
>Feitian PKI card: https://sourceforge.net/projects/eidauthenticate/
>
>I am trying without success. 
>The mini-driver is installed. 
>Any idea?
>
>Kind regards,
>Jean-Michel
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:01:23 +0100
>From: Juan Antonio Martinez <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Short form for the log message
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
>[ ... ]
>> Going for log4c or similar would IMHO be a total overkill, 
>> as is implementing anything internal that is designed for RFU.
>> Focus should be on things related to smart cards, not logging :)
>> If you want debug logging, too much is better than too little 
>> (you can always use grep). Under normal conditions, 
>> OpenSC should not leave a log ("User entered a PIN", 
>> "User signed some data" makes no sense).
>
>Perhaps you're right. I'm next to start testing on Spanish DNIe 
>LGPL card driver, and was looking for an easy way to test & debug 
>my code, without looking through megabytes of mostly-unwanted logs.
>Not allways "grep" is a friend
>
>Anyway short form for the log message code makes life easier
>
>Juan Antonio
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
>Name: smime.p7s
>Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
>Size: 1998 bytes
>Desc: not available
>Url : 
>http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/attachments/20110104/f27868ff/attachment-0001.bin
> 
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:07:09 +0100
>From: Peter Stuge <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Using eID authenticate with the Feitian
>       PKI
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE wrote:
>> Did any succeed in using eID authenticate under Windows 7 with the
>> Feitian PKI card: https://sourceforge.net/projects/eidauthenticate/
>
>This seems to only be for use with eid. Do you mean that you imported
>your eid onto the feitian card?
>
>
>//Peter
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:10:02 +0100
>From: Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Using eID authenticate with the Feitian
>       PKI
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <1294153802.4523.1.ca...@acer>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 ? 16:07 +0100, Peter Stuge a ?crit :
>> This seems to only be for use with eid. Do you mean that you imported
>> your eid onto the feitian card? 
>
>>From their homepage, I understand that any card with mini-driver should
>be supported. But it does not seem to work. So I contacted the original
>author and proposed him a free Feitian PKI.
>
>Kind regards,
>-- 
>                  Jean-Michel Pour? - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:28:45 +0100
>From: Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Using eID authenticate with the Feitian
>       PKI
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <1294154925.4523.5.ca...@acer>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 ? 16:10 +0100, Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE a
>?crit :
>> So I contacted the original
>> author and proposed him a free Feitian PKI. 
>
>OK. The author replied and we will work together for a better OpenSC
>support.
>-- 
>                  Jean-Michel Pour? - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 18:15:44 +0100
>From: Andreas Jellinghaus <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Canonical mailing list address
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: Peter Stuge <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Am Montag 03 Januar 2011, um 23:59:47 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>> > opensc-devel mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>> 
>> I would appreciate if we could change the canonical email address of
>> the list to be *without* the lists. name. Possible?
>
>but it is much easier to direkt all emails to @lists.opensc-project.org
>to mailman. the alternative would be to write a long list of all those
><list> and <list>-<postfix> email addresses and manualy direkt those
>to mailman. been there, done that, much more work on the admin side.
>
>we could remove the old aliases @opensc-project.org so they finaly die.
>no idea why people still use them, guess old contacts in their email apps.
>
>Regards, Andreas
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:26:40 +0200
>From: Martin Paljak <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Canonical mailing list address
>To: Andreas Jellinghaus <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected], Peter Stuge
>       <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
>On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:15 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
>> Am Montag 03 Januar 2011, um 23:59:47 schrieb Peter Stuge:
>>>> opensc-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>>> 
>>> I would appreciate if we could change the canonical email address of
>>> the list to be *without* the lists. name. Possible?
>> 
>> but it is much easier to direkt all emails to @lists.opensc-project.org
>> to mailman. the alternative would be to write a long list of all those
>> <list> and <list>-<postfix> email addresses and manualy direkt those
>> to mailman. been there, done that, much more work on the admin side.
>> 
>> we could remove the old aliases @opensc-project.org so they finaly die.
>> no idea why people still use them, guess old contacts in their email apps.
>
>I for one use the @opensc-project.org by default. Because it is shorter. And 
>because it is the default suggested by my mail clients...
>
>Taking into account that there are only 4 mailing lists 
>(user,devel,commits,announce) it is not that much work. IMHO It could be even 
>less (devel, commits, announce).
>But I agree that from admin POV the lists.* is better (allows to move lists to 
>another host for example, if needed)
>
>-- 
>@MartinPaljak.net
>+3725156495
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 20:31:51 +0100
>From: Andreas Jellinghaus <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] FOSDEM 2011: february 5th and 6th
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm really sorry and it is frustrating, but things went
>wrong here and I won't be able to make it to fosdem this
>year. Still I hope many of you can make it and will have
>a good time.
>
>With best regards, Andreas
>
>p.s. And a happy new year to all of you!
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 22:13:05 +0100
>From: Peter Stuge <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Canonical mailing list address
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Martin Paljak wrote:
>> >> I would appreciate if we could change the canonical email address of
>> >> the list to be *without* the lists. name. Possible?
>> > 
>> > but it is much easier to direkt all emails to @lists.opensc-project.org
>> > to mailman.
>
>Is this the only argument?
>
>
>> > the alternative would be to write a long list of all those
>> > <list> and <list>-<postfix> email addresses and manualy direkt those
>> > to mailman. been there, done that, much more work on the admin side.
>
>Hm? Is anyone using email addresses @opensc-project.org ?
>
>
>> I for one use the @opensc-project.org by default.
>
>I'd like that too.
>
>
>> Because it is shorter.
>
>Yes.
>
>
>> But I agree that from admin POV the lists.* is better (allows to
>> move lists to another host for example, if needed)
>
>MX records can still be changed if the email should be handled
>somewhere else. Again, is there any email besides the lists at the
>domain?
>
>
>//Peter
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 07:24:50 +0100
>From: Andreas Jellinghaus <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Canonical mailing list address
>To: [email protected]
>Cc: Peter Stuge <[email protected]>
>Message-ID: <[email protected]>
>Content-Type: Text/Plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>the biggest argument of course is: why change a working system?
>also, it might affect every single user, if we change the email
>address of the list, so that alone is a very good reason to not
>do that.
>
>> Hm? Is anyone using email addresses @opensc-project.org ?
>
>19 emails to [email protected], 1 to opensc-u...@opensc-
>project.org (so far: this year). mostly martin, viktor, you, and a few
>other people.
>
>Regards, Andreas
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 11
>Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 08:17:15 +0100
>From: Jean-Michel Pour? - GOOZE <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [opensc-devel] Windows 7 support for PKCS#11 =>
>       mini-driver
>To: [email protected]
>Message-ID: <1294211835.3790.2.ca...@acer>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
>Dear all,
>
>http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2009-February/011905.html 
>
>This seems very promising. Is there any reason why not to commit this
>code to OpenSC repository directly?
>
>> Nevertheless, it would be nice if somebody reanimated one of the
>> PKCS#11 related CSP-s.
>
>+1. This would allow to use some Windows tools: smartcard login, native
>disc encryption, Internet Explorer 8, etc ...
>
>Kind regards,
>-- 
>                  Jean-Michel Pour? - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>opensc-devel mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
>
>End of opensc-devel Digest, Vol 97, Issue 7
>*******************************************
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel

Reply via email to