On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 17:58 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> On 13.01.2011 17:07, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > OpenSC as a library doesn't need it's own logging system. Such things
> > are better placed at application level. If debugging is necessary, then
> > 'export OPENSC_DEBUG=9' + pkcs11-spy works for me.
> >
> > What would be the advantage of having logs of different instances of
> > OpenSC intermixed in a single file?
>
> To have shorter line in logs,
> "card.c:322:sc_unlock: called"
> instead of
> "0x2b20d02e53f0 17:50:57.667 [opensc-explorer] card.c:322:sc_unlock:
> called"
Making the lines shorter isn't that bad. But making it configurable is a
lot of overhead. Personally I wouldn't miss anything if a line would
look like this: "card.c:322:sc_unlock: called"
> Well, I do not see general enthusiasm, let's forget it.
>
> > Regards
> > Andre
> Kind wishes,
> Viktor.
>
>
> > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:14 +0100, Viktor TARASOV wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> what do you think about possibility to configure content of the log
> >> message.
> >>
> >> I mean something like this in 'opensc.conf':
> >>
> >> app default {
> >> log_level = debug;
> >> log debug {
> >> debug = 8;
> >> debug_file = /tmp/opensc-debug.log;
> >>
> >> print_pid = false; #default true
> >> print_timestamp = false; #default true
> >> print_app_name = false; #default true
> >> }
> >> ...
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind wishes,
> >> Viktor.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> opensc-devel mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
opensc-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
