Hi Vincent, hi Andreas,
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 10:56 +0200, Vincent Honnet wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> If the bounding box test is enough then it would be great to have such
> an optimisation. Just for information, what does the panning exactly ?
hm, the bounding box test would a little hard to do, as that would have
to change the IntersectAction. But there is already a fallback if you
click nothing, which could be used instead.
The pan tries to keep the point on the model you clicked under the mouse
cursor, to avoid the need to different panning scales and the endless
click-drag orgies that many panning modes need. But to do that it needs
to know the point on the model, and that's what the intersection is for.
I was thinking about doing some automatic thing that turns off the
intersection if it takes too long, but it doesn't look I'll have time
for that. It would be easy to do a manual version where you just tell
the Navigator to not do the intersection. You can simulate that behavior
by clicking somewhere on the background and dragging.
Would that be enough?
Yours
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users