Hello Patrik, that sounds really terrific. Without giving it a try, a short question: Can everything be saved to disk and loaded back again ?
Regards Matthias On Saturday 24 September 2005 00:08, Patrick Hartling wrote: > I have done some more work on the new attachment type that I > submitted for review earlier this week. The changes are as follows: > > * Added another attribute map attachment type that maps > std::string to OSG::FieldContainerPtr (inspired by Marcus' comment > and input from Allen Bierbaum and Dirk) > * Reduced the number of free functions to two, both of which are > used for easy retrieval of the attribute map attachment from an > attachment container > * Fixed the visibility to be external so that the attribute maps > will be shared on a cluster and serialized correctly (thanks to Dirk > for the clarification on that detail) > * Added a public override of the const version of getKeys() so > that user code can get read-only access to the keys in the attribute > map > > The first of those is probably the Big New Thing. The test program > for that code (testFCPtrAttributeMap.cpp) shows how a variety of > field containers can be stored in a single attribute map. For > example: > > OSG::beginEditCP(attr_map); > (*attr_map)["transform attribute"] = > OSG::Transform::create(); (*attr_map)["geometry attribute"] = > OSG::Geometry::create(); (*attr_map)["material attribute"] = > OSG::SimpleMaterial::create(); OSG::endEditCP(attr_map); > > Comments or suggestions? > > -Patrick ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
