Hi Dirk,
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Dirk Reiners wrote:
I need to install OpenSG on a SuSE 10 machine. The sysadmin has already
installed the 1.6 rpms for SuSE 9.1 from the website. The question is,
should I bother trying to compile and install from source, or are the
rpms good enough for general use?
The dailbybuild also generates RPMs, so you could ue those if you want
to.
That's a good idea! But unfortunately it seems that the binaries for SuSE
9.1 are incompatible with SuSE 10, so I'll have to compile from source
anyway (and then I just compile a recent dailybuild obviously... )
BTW, SuSE 10 ships with g++ 4.0.2 so you need to hack the LANG_FLAG's from
CommonConf/common.i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++4.in into
CommonConf/common.i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++.in in order to do the massive
inlining required by OpenSG properly.
As another sidenote, http://www.opensg.org/dailybuild_logs/config.EN.html
still says the lib is compiled by with 'gcc version 2.95.3 20010315
(SuSE)' and Qt 3.0, which is probably not the case anymore. :-)
Also, I've read that there has been a lot of bugfixes/enhancements
added since 1.6 (hint, khm, *snapshots*, wink, wink :) so it might be a
good idea to compile from sources anyway.
See above. And yes, there will be a snapshot release at some point, but
there are some other things I need to finish first.
Thanks in advance. :-)
Yours,
Akos
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
