Hi Gerrit,
On Sat, 2006-03-18 at 12:17 +0800, Gerrit Voss wrote:
>
> > Sideline: you're running Rocks on your cluster? Happy with it?
>
> so far yes, it required lot less tweaking than OSCAR to get it running,
> and most of the problems weren't actually Rocks problems but general
> Centos 4.1 x86_64 problems on hp xw9300 machines (segfaults during
> filesystem creation).
>
> But I'm just starting to modify it to suit our needs (e.g. building an
> OpenSG-Viz roll ;-))
Sounds good! When are we getting that in the CVS? :)
> The 'reinstall from scratch often' approach is kind of strange in the
> beginning but it seems to work well in combination with building your
> own roll (which is quite easy to do) to make the configuration changes
> persistent. It also helps to make sure it not just worked because you
> have some old stuff and tweaks lying around. But it is clearly tailored
> to production systems, how it will play out in a dev environment I'm not
> quite sure. But again the system connected to our main demos display is
> kind of 'production' use ;-)
Wouldn't be the first dev system that is used productively, but that
doesn't make it a production system. ;)
> hmm that's interesting (and confusing) as CentOS should be a RH4 clone
> but all the tools are different versions ;-). My gcc is newer but my
> python and boost packages are older.
Ah, sorry. I installed python and boost separately for other reasons,
the system supplied ones are 2.3 and 1.32.
Yours
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
