Hi Marcus,
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 21:36 +0200, Marcus Lindblom wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request that the version numbers in OpenSG get a bit
> more ordering to themselves. Currently there are x builds actually named
> 1.6.0. Changing so that subsequent versions get at least 1.6.1 or
> 1.6.dev or something should be doable.
Sorry. I had that changed locally since March, but never committed it. I
set it to 1.8.0Alpha1.
> With the new Subversion repository, it is also possible to attach the
> revision number to the code on build (via subwcrev) so that it is
> positively certain exactly what version is being run. I have an example
> of this at work, so I could post that to get you started. It is just a
> cpp-file which is updated with repo info (plus some more) during
> distribution builds.
>
> Is this something planned or so? I suggest changing the repo _now_ to
> avoid further issues with downloading the 1.6 'original' and the 1.6
> dailybuild.
I'm interested. I looked at subwcrev, but it didn't look that obvious.
Especially since it's a Windows executable that's part of
TortoiseSVN... ;) I would assume that svn can do keyword substitution,
so I'm not sure what I need it for.
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
