Hi Christoph,
Christoph Fünfzig wrote:
>
> for abstracting from where the file (scene, image, texture,..) came
> from, it is necessary to store
> the relative path (relative to the base file) used for retrieving the file.
> The absolute path/locator (used to complete the relative path) should be
> stored separately, I think.
Agreed. The relative name is more important. For saving things out I
think we need to change the names from whatever they are to a realtive
name anyway. The writer needs to get an option whether it needs to write
out the data in a new file or use the data from the original location.
> I remember, the Image stores the absolute path (as a single field
> Name???), the relative path (as an attachment "fullFilePath"), the file
> name (as an attachment "fileName") currently.
> Why is the absolute path stored in the single field Name???
> How about storing the file name as a field (it does not change and it
> does not depend on paths, for memory images it is just empty) and the
> path information (relative path and absolute path/locator) as attachments.
> Additionally, it would be helpfull for me to know all places in the
> current code, where name/path information is stored ;-)
I think those two are it right now. ;)
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
