Hi, On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 20:26 +0100, Patrick Dähne wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm a little undecided. I would like to see tickets for most of > > these to > > simplify keeping track of who does what until when. > > > > I think the main part is to decide what could be ported or what is > > obsoleted by changes in 2 anyway, then decide what will not be ported > > for whatever reason and a quick estimate how much effort it would > > be to > > port (trivial, 1 hour or less, more than 1 hour), and then to open > > tickets for the things that need to be ported, and finally do them. > > > > I realize that step 1 is difficult, but if anybody wants to take a > > first > > stab I'd appreciate it. > > The difficult part is not porting features, it is porting bug fixes > made in OSG1. This means that you have to look at every check-in made > since "to_gv_merge_7". And there are *lots* of check-ins. Have a look > onto your list.
Difficult it is not, work it is ;-). It is the only way to keep things consistent ! Technically there is no difference between bug fix and feature. That's why I would prefer not to put bug fixes in both branches immediately at the same time, but make sure that the complete 1.8 head is taken over. Otherwise it will get very messy. I did that for a couple of times and it is feasible with a combination of cvs diff, patch and manual work. regards, gerrit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Opensg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
