Hi Patrick,
Patrick Dähne wrote:
> Hello,
>
> when incrementing and decrementing reference counters, in OpenSG 1.x
> we had to use "addRefCP()"/"subRefCP()" for FieldContainers and
> "addRefP()"/"subRefP()" for MemoryObjects. In OpenSG 2.0, we can
> either use "addRef()"/"subRef()" or "addRefP()"/"subRefP()" for both
> FieldContainers and MemoryObjects. But which one is the recommended/
> correct variant?
Given that addRefP is a template wrapper around any type they're functionally
equivalent. I'm not quite sure what the motivation for addRef() was. Gerrit, in
which case does addRefP not work?
Personally I'd prefer addRef as a cleaner syntax, but I need to understant the
reasoning behind both first.
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users
