Dirk Reiners wrote:
>       Hi David,
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> pkg-config is provided instead, as this is how other libraries in Ubuntu
>> provide the information.
>>
>> pkg-config libopensg --libs
>>
>> pkg-config libopensg --cflags
> 
> Hm, ok. Is hte usual way to not provide XXX-config for packages that usually 
> use 
> it, or to add support to pkg-config? Personally I think it would be better to 
> have both, so that software that works on other systems (like the Examples 
> and 
> Tutorials) also works on Ubuntu, but if the policy is not to do that we need 
> to 
> think about a way to make the default OpenSG Makefiles smarter.

Yes, we ran into this issue recently. I understand (second-hand) that 
the Ubuntu package also does not include fcdEdit, making it useless for 
projects that create custom FieldContainers. And when you try to compile 
fcdEdit, it can't find osg-config!



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Opensg-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensg-users

Reply via email to