Thanks for doing that Andy. That has cleared up some of the mess on the bug tracker.
I have just cleared up a little bit more of the duplicates, and asked for info on others - marking them incomplete. Gradually we are getting the bug tracker back into shape again. :-) Best wishes, Helen On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 16:50 +0100, Andrew Finch wrote: > Yes I don't mind doing it - I'm used to being a beast of burden :-) > > 2009/9/16 Helen McCall <[email protected]> > Hello Andy, > > I think it would be a good idea to mark them as released. This > would > clean up the bug tracker very nicely, and make it more > manageable. > > Is everyone else in agreement with this? > > Andy; are you volunteering? :-) > > Best wishes, Helen > > > > > On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:15 +0100, Andrew Finch wrote: > > While we're at it, should we mark all the 'Fix committed' > bugs as > > released? Launchpad still regards them as open until you > mark them as > > Fix Released. > > > > Andy. > > > > 2009/9/16 Jonathan Thomas <[email protected]> > > The .DEB installer on the download page has been > updated to > > Version 0.9.34. I'm not going to blog about the > update quite > > yet. Let's see if this new installer causes any big > issues > > first. =) It's quite a bit different than the > previous one. > > It has an improved "postinst" file, the new > re-factored folder > > structure, a new bin file, a new location > (/usr/share instead > > of /usr/local/share), and includes all of the mime, > man, > > pixmaps, and other installation files. It also > includes the 7 > > most common language packs. > > > > I tested this locally, and in VirtualBox (on a clean > Ubuntu > > 9.04 64 bit system). It seemed to work great, so > cross your > > fingers. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jonathan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Jonathan Thomas > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Helen, I agree with you. I have been > planning on > > updating the .deb with our newest version, > but all the > > re-factoring made me a bit hesitant. > Anyway, I will > > try and update the .deb soon. > > > > Thanks, > > -Jonathan > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Helen > McCall > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am re-sending this one because my > earlier > > send never arrived > > from the list so might have got > lost. > > > > A high proportion of the bug reports > we are > > currently getting all relate > > to the experimental .deb packages > for OpenShot > > 0.9.22 > > > > I am suggesting that these packages > be removed > > from the download, and > > replaced with the new packages so > that bug > > reports are relevant to the > > development of OpenShot. > > > > I have started a FAQ page on > Launchpad, and > > added a FAQ about upgrading > > from 0.9.22 > > > > If we remove 0.9.22 from the > downloads I will > > be able to then deprecate > > the historic bug reports and we will > then have > > much more manageable bug > > management. > > > > Best wishes, Helen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openshot.developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openshot.developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
