Hi, Thanks for the feedback...
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:15:38 +0000 Justin Clark-Casey <jjusti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Mike Mazur wrote: > > So instead of having: > > > > AssetBase ab = new AssetBase(); > > ab.Name = "some name"; > > ab.Description = "some description"; > > > > I would write: > > > > AssetBase ab = new AssetBase(); > > ab.Metadata.Name = "some name"; > > ab.Metadata.Description = "some description"; > > > > Just to clarify, you're anticipating changing the > OpenSim.Framework.AssetBase class (instead of having a parallel class > in the AssetServer code)? If so, sounds good to me. Yes, I'd like to modify OpenSim.Framework.AssetBase. > > Should the Metadata class be renamed to AssetMetadata? Any other > > thoughts? > > From a readability perspective I would rather see it remain as just > Metadata, since something like > > AssetBase myAsset = new AssetBase(); > myAsset.AssetMetadata.Name = "Heloooo"; > > looks kind of redundant to me (though this may just be a taste issue). Yeah, that seems redundant, although since the class lives in OpenSim.Framework, and not something more specific (like OpenSim.Framework.Assets, for example), the OpenSim.Framework.Metadata class would be pretty ambiguous; what is the Metadata for? For the time being I'll go ahead with OpenSim.Framework.Metadata. Thanks! Mike _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
