The folks on this mailing list have the power to make OpenSim more compatible with patches to the source.
So, as we go forward, lets exercise that power and add the missing implementation sections of a few dozen functions *and* find the ones that are not compatible and work out the details. Charles ________________________________ From: Frank Nichols <fr...@thenichols.net> To: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 7:38:00 AM Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] 23 LSL functions remaining I think it is a matter of perspective, a "better" way to look at this issue - does this raise the question whether Secondlife can be used as a development tool for Opensim? If Opensim achieves it's desired goals then Secondlife will be relegated to a tiny corner of the new internet. Colin B. Withers wrote: > There is also the question of compatibility with LSL. Questions have been > raised about whether Opensim can be used as a development tool for SL. Here > is one thread that calls compatibility into question: > > http://www.sluniverse.com/php/vb/opensim-discussion/26340-opensim-compatibility-place-develop-secondlife.html > > Is the aim to have 100% compatibilty, so that scripts developed in Opensim > will be guaranteed to work in SL, and vice versa? As the old saying goes, you > cannot be a little bit pregnant, it is either 100% or nothing. > > Rock > _______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________ Opensim-dev mailing list Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
