Content signing is definitely _way_ out of scope. But that doesn't mean
that we shouldn't talk about it.
My impression is that if that ever happens, it must happen as a 3rd
party service. I just don't see how that can work S2S.
HG is about doing the best that can be done with S2S, because S2S is an
architecture that has proven to be robust and scalable historically
speaking. What can't be done with S2S... 3rd party services ftw!
[email protected] wrote:
You know, well is there a way for us to know what is included in HG 1.5.
And what is the plan for HG 2.0?
Maybe some of would like to address these issues because we have systems
we are working on.
M.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Karen Palen
*Sent:* Thursday, September 02, 2010 11:34 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Opensim-dev] Signing content to prevent malicous creator
spoofing was "Re: Global identifiers"
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Robert G. Jakabosky
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Changed subject to reflect new topic, sorry for thread hijacking. I should
have started a new thread.
<https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev>
As Diva pointed out to me (maybe in a private email) this discussion
ONLY affects the goals of HG2.0 NOT the present HG1.5!
HG 1.5 makes NO attempt to provide ANY DRM, merely to prevent a
malicious host grid/world from stealing content from visitors!
This conversation is essential to HG 2.0, but has NO relevance to the
current goal of making HG 1.5 work correctly!
Karen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
