If anyone here is willing to help with maintaining ever increasingly
complex code and supporting users, feel free to chip in. Talk is cheap.

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Frank Nichols <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Then basically we can never diverge away from SL since any divergence is
> going to break existing scripts that require compatibility.
>
> If we don't bite the bullet and make the changes, i do believe OS will
> (has?) stagnate. It seems every time outside resources try to make changes
> and help we end up back at the argument that too much legacy code will have
> to be rewritten.  I suggest that we "fork" core, in essence. By this i mean
> we have a switch in core, SL COMPATIBILITY MODE. switch equals true and it
> runs the code as it is, switch equals FALSE and it runs a new code base
> with changes. Default can be true. I then suggest we focus future
> development on the new branch that is not compatible.
>
> Frank
>
> Sent from my iPad Air 2
>
> On Apr 24, 2015, at 6:00 PM, Michael Emory Cerquoni <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I am all for diverging away from SL, but not at the expense of breaking
> existing systems or content, because ultimately its the core development
> team who has to deal with the fall out of that.
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Seth Nygard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I am in full support of showing the actual numbers for all system
>> metrics.  It is long past time we dispensed with trying to be like SL when
>> we are not in so many ways already.
>>
>> What I would suggest as a solution that should fit everyone's needs.  How
>> about we add a scaling factor that can be set in the INI file.  This can be
>> set to yield the current inflated numbers by default, but can also be set
>> to 1 for anyone wanting real numbers.
>>
>> -Seth
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:50 PM, <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Send Opensim-dev mailing list submissions to
>>>         [email protected]
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>         http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>         [email protected]
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>         [email protected]
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Opensim-dev digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>    1. Re: MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED) (Michael Emory Cerquoni)
>>>    2. Re: MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED) (Michael Emory Cerquoni)
>>>    3. Re: MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED) (Michael Emory Cerquoni)
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:40:39 -0400
>>> From: Michael Emory Cerquoni <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED)
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <CAF5=
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> ok I will continue testing this for now, we should try to resolve the
>>> white
>>> space issues before it hits core, we can worry about that later though. I
>>> hope others can start testing this patch as well we need to really make
>>> sure this does not break any scripts or monitoring apps before this
>>> changes
>>> the core code, so anyone who has the time please do test this and let us
>>> know if you notice anything change or break, thanks!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Maxwell, Douglas CIV USARMY ARL (US) <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> > Caveats: NONE
>>> >
>>> > What you saw were just warnings about white spaces.  The patch should
>>> still
>>> > apply and work.  We follows the open simulator patch creation guidance
>>> > explicitly, if you guys have updated instructions for how you want this
>>> > done -
>>> > let us know.  Otherwise, you can ignore the warnings.
>>> >
>>> > v/r -douglas
>>> >
>>> > Douglas Maxwell, MSME
>>> > Science and Technology Manager
>>> > Virtual World Strategic Applications
>>> > U.S. Army Research Lab
>>> > Simulation & Training Technology Center (STTC)
>>> > (c) (407) 242-0209
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: [email protected]
>>> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
>>> Emory
>>> > Cerquoni
>>> > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:38 PM
>>> > To: [email protected]
>>> > Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted
>>> >
>>> > please check the mantis, i had some trouble applying patch for testing,
>>> > thanks
>>> > guys!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Michael Heilmann <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >         Opensim Devs
>>> >
>>> >         Just an FYI, mantis bug #7540 is the first code submission from
>>> > project
>>> > MOSES.  Thanks.
>>> >
>>> >         --
>>> >         Michael Heilmann
>>> >         Research Associate
>>> >         Institute for Simulation and Training
>>> >         University of Central Florida
>>> >
>>> >         _______________________________________________
>>> >         Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> >         [email protected]
>>> >         http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> > <blockedhttp://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> > Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >
>>> > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> > Caveats: NONE
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> > [email protected]
>>> > http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20150424/981b6919/attachment-0001.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:42:52 -0400
>>> From: Michael Emory Cerquoni <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED)
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <CAF5=
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> ok so just so I understand we should now see this actually just display
>>> 11fps? Personally I think this is a bad idea, alot of people may be using
>>> monitoring apps and scripts that look for low fps and restart the region,
>>> we would basically be forcing everyone to rewrite a lot of code to
>>> accommodate a singular purpose? Not quite sure how this improves the
>>> project as a whole.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Michael Emory Cerquoni <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > ok I will continue testing this for now, we should try to resolve the
>>> > white space issues before it hits core, we can worry about that later
>>> > though. I hope others can start testing this patch as well we need to
>>> > really make sure this does not break any scripts or monitoring apps
>>> before
>>> > this changes the core code, so anyone who has the time please do test
>>> this
>>> > and let us know if you notice anything change or break, thanks!
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Maxwell, Douglas CIV USARMY ARL (US) <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> >> Caveats: NONE
>>> >>
>>> >> What you saw were just warnings about white spaces.  The patch should
>>> >> still
>>> >> apply and work.  We follows the open simulator patch creation guidance
>>> >> explicitly, if you guys have updated instructions for how you want
>>> this
>>> >> done -
>>> >> let us know.  Otherwise, you can ignore the warnings.
>>> >>
>>> >> v/r -douglas
>>> >>
>>> >> Douglas Maxwell, MSME
>>> >> Science and Technology Manager
>>> >> Virtual World Strategic Applications
>>> >> U.S. Army Research Lab
>>> >> Simulation & Training Technology Center (STTC)
>>> >> (c) (407) 242-0209
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: [email protected]
>>> >> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
>>> Emory
>>> >> Cerquoni
>>> >> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:38 PM
>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>> >> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted
>>> >>
>>> >> please check the mantis, i had some trouble applying patch for
>>> testing,
>>> >> thanks
>>> >> guys!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Michael Heilmann <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>         Opensim Devs
>>> >>
>>> >>         Just an FYI, mantis bug #7540 is the first code submission
>>> from
>>> >> project
>>> >> MOSES.  Thanks.
>>> >>
>>> >>         --
>>> >>         Michael Heilmann
>>> >>         Research Associate
>>> >>         Institute for Simulation and Training
>>> >>         University of Central Florida
>>> >>
>>> >>         _______________________________________________
>>> >>         Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> >>         [email protected]
>>> >>         http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >> <blockedhttp://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >>
>>> >> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> >> Caveats: NONE
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> >> [email protected]
>>> >> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20150424/ac0c082d/attachment-0001.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:50:32 -0400
>>> From: Michael Emory Cerquoni <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted (UNCLASSIFIED)
>>> Message-ID:
>>>         <CAF5=rqWbXjfgv5Au9VDa+_b8AsvY4NpL2CFxY=4L=ncE=
>>> [email protected]>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>>
>>> I have to admit I am a bit bewildered at this patch, what is the actual
>>> benefit of reporting the actual numbers if it has the potential to break
>>> so
>>> much?  Can we rethink this and have this be a variable that can be
>>> configured for different applications, I really hate the idea of forcing
>>> this change on everyone without much better ability to explain why this
>>> is
>>> so important, having it just go from 55fps to 11fps is going to freak
>>> people out and cause a lot of problems for the core development support
>>> teams.  To me it makes more sense to make the multiplication factor
>>> configurable so that if a certain grid wants to run at normal stats they
>>> can set the modifier to 1.0 if a certain grid wants to be an analogue of
>>> second life they can change the modifier to 5.0, but if forcing everyone
>>> to
>>> use this is the only option I have to say my vote is -1 for inclusion at
>>> this point, unless someone can really convince me why this is so
>>> important
>>> otherwise.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Michael Emory Cerquoni <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> > ok so just so I understand we should now see this actually just display
>>> > 11fps? Personally I think this is a bad idea, alot of people may be
>>> using
>>> > monitoring apps and scripts that look for low fps and restart the
>>> region,
>>> > we would basically be forcing everyone to rewrite a lot of code to
>>> > accommodate a singular purpose? Not quite sure how this improves the
>>> > project as a whole.
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Michael Emory Cerquoni <
>>> > [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> ok I will continue testing this for now, we should try to resolve the
>>> >> white space issues before it hits core, we can worry about that later
>>> >> though. I hope others can start testing this patch as well we need to
>>> >> really make sure this does not break any scripts or monitoring apps
>>> before
>>> >> this changes the core code, so anyone who has the time please do test
>>> this
>>> >> and let us know if you notice anything change or break, thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Maxwell, Douglas CIV USARMY ARL (US)
>>> <
>>> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> >>> Caveats: NONE
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What you saw were just warnings about white spaces.  The patch should
>>> >>> still
>>> >>> apply and work.  We follows the open simulator patch creation
>>> guidance
>>> >>> explicitly, if you guys have updated instructions for how you want
>>> this
>>> >>> done -
>>> >>> let us know.  Otherwise, you can ignore the warnings.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> v/r -douglas
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Douglas Maxwell, MSME
>>> >>> Science and Technology Manager
>>> >>> Virtual World Strategic Applications
>>> >>> U.S. Army Research Lab
>>> >>> Simulation & Training Technology Center (STTC)
>>> >>> (c) (407) 242-0209
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>>> >>> From: [email protected]
>>> >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael
>>> >>> Emory
>>> >>> Cerquoni
>>> >>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:38 PM
>>> >>> To: [email protected]
>>> >>> Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] MOSES patch submitted
>>> >>>
>>> >>> please check the mantis, i had some trouble applying patch for
>>> testing,
>>> >>> thanks
>>> >>> guys!
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Michael Heilmann <
>>> [email protected]>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>         Opensim Devs
>>> >>>
>>> >>>         Just an FYI, mantis bug #7540 is the first code submission
>>> from
>>> >>> project
>>> >>> MOSES.  Thanks.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>         --
>>> >>>         Michael Heilmann
>>> >>>         Research Associate
>>> >>>         Institute for Simulation and Training
>>> >>>         University of Central Florida
>>> >>>
>>> >>>         _______________________________________________
>>> >>>         Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> >>>         [email protected]
>>> >>>
>>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >>> <blockedhttp://
>>> opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
>>> >>> Caveats: NONE
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> >>> [email protected]
>>> >>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>>> -------------- next part --------------
>>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>> URL: <
>>> http://opensimulator.org/pipermail/opensim-dev/attachments/20150424/28f4856d/attachment.html
>>> >
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> End of Opensim-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 34
>>> *******************************************
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Opensim-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Michael Emory Cerquoni
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opensim-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
Opensim-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://opensimulator.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/opensim-dev

Reply via email to