Why aren't any google techs responding to us?

Greg

On Nov 5, 1:23 pm, twentyafterfour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aparently there is no validation/authentication of any kind. As far as
> I can tell,
>  at least for right now, the api is thoroughly and disgustingly
> insecure.
>
> On Nov 5, 10:52 am, "Mat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have exactly the same concern, I really don't like the idea of this being
> > javascript based. My intention is to therefore using the data api's for the
> > majority of the work, and just use the javascript side to bring up user
> > information, and other none security related tasks. Is anyone else looking
> > at using the data api in such a way? My main concern with this is I have yet
> > to understand how from a PHP session I can validate the user, could anyone
> > explain this?
>
> > Mat
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected]
>
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of EGreg
> > Sent: 05 November 2007 16:38
> > To: OpenSocial Developers
> > Subject: [opensocial] Really BIG Security Concern
>
> > In facebook, your app runs on your server, and users cannot modify it.
>
> > On orkut, ning, and later myspace, your app consists of javascript in
> > a box. Simply by typing javascript:code into the address bar, you can
> > execute requests on its behalf. What's worse, it seems there is no way
> > in principle to defeat this, as long as the variables are on the
> > client side. A person can execute arbitrary javascript code using
> > firebug or some such firefox extension. And depending on the gadgets
> > they can probably even figure out a way to do VIRAL cross-site
> > scripting, like the "I have a million friends" hack on myspace.
>
> > The one thing I would recommend right now, to achieve a moderate
> > degree of security is:
> > OBFUSCATE YOUR CODE BEFORE SUBMITTING TO GOOGLE
>
> > Yeah, use a packer and/or obfuscator to "compile" your code to
> > unreadable form. A determined person can probably still unravel it
> > back. Software programs can be decompiled too... but the impact is
> > only confined to one person's computer. Here, it may be MUCH greater.
>
> > The social networks should take care with this security. Is Google
> > working to fix the situation? There's gotta be a way...
>
> > Greg Magarshak


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OpenSocial Developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to