Looks like it got included in the 0.9 spec. Awesome! ~Arne
On Nov 17, 3:39 am, Kaan Bingol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the info Arne, > > I have posted to spec list for a possible standardization > > http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/browse_thr... > > Kaan > > On Nov 16, 10:11 pm, Arne Roomann-Kurrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hi Kaan, > > > Currently, I believe that the two types of response for this are to > > return nothing at all (like orkut) or return a Person object with ID > > of -1 (like MySpace). It sounds like this would be a great thing for > > the spec to define. Can you post a thread > > tohttp://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-and-gadgets-spec/topics > > asking for standardization here? > > > ~Arne > > > On Nov 15, 12:55 am, Kaan Bingol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a common practice among different containers to set VIEWER > > > for anonymous or guest users. I know some containers do not allow > > > anonymous users to reach open social apps but since there are > > > increasingly different containers and uses of open social gadgets, how > > > a container sets VIEWER if user is not logged-in becomes important. > > > Should it be null or a specific like Guest? > > > > A gadget may need to know this notation in order to handle anonymous > > > users. Any information on how various containers handle this, is > > > useful to build a common practice. > > > > Thanks, > > > Kaan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OpenSocial Application Development" group. To post to this group, send email to opensocial-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/opensocial-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
