On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 11:58 -0700, Randy Fishel wrote: > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, James Carlson wrote: > > > > > What about /etc/default/sys-suspend and the "Syssuspend*" family of X > > resources? > > > > /etc/default/sys-suspend is part of the CDE consolidation. > gnome-sys-suspend was a GNOME equivilent of the Motif sys-suspend > tool, so to make them somewhat compatible, gnome-sys-suspend consumed > the defaults file. I don't suspect this case intends to do anything > with /etc/default/sys-suspend, and leave it to CDE for disposition. > > On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Gary Winiger wrote: > > > Brian, > > > > I've not followed along for a while, so excuse my ignorance. > > How will this relate to/affect things like the recent work in > > uadmin(1M) to bring the system down properly with relationship > > to the audit subsystem? I've left this intact and Cc-ed Randy > > because recently he said that he was doing stuff in this area > > relative to lid closure events. I believe there's also some > > work going on to EOF sys-suspend(1M) (/usr/openwin/bin/sys-syspend). > > Is there any relationship with that project? > > > > gnome-sys-suspend doesn't do the expected auditing. However, it has > very limited usability on x86 platforms (meaning: it is broken), and > should either be fixed or removed. The team choose to remove it > (which is OK by me). > > There is some intention to EOF /usr/openwin/bin/sys-syspend as a > continuation of the CDE EOF. I don't expect this case to care much > about that one, though not the other way around. > > However, the PM teams are working on a proposal for a library and > cli's which would provide the committed API's to be used for power > management control (and for things like GPM and/or HAL to consume) > which would make /usr/openwin/bin/sys-syspend obsolete. That is not > part of this case, but is made for reference. Hi Randy,
Do you have the case number now? If not, would you please inform me when you file the case? I will add your case in my one-pager. Regards, Jedy > > > ---- Randy
