Peter Memishian writes:
>    * Section 3.17: To resolve a conflict with the new architecture, IPMP
>      Singleton no longer allows an IP data address to double as an IP test
>      address.  More generally, this section has been expanded to cover
>      additional issues we (the Sun Cluster and Clearview teams) discovered
>      while bringing a Clearview IPMP cluster up.

Does this project obsolete 2002/278 (Singleton IPMP Group) and
2002/763 (Contract for use of SIOCGLIFGROUPNAME)?

Is there a new contract to replace PSARC/2002/763-01?

It's good that we have the affected teams talking, but I think
completing the case will require a follow-up.

>    * Section 5.18: To ensure IPMP-unaware MIB applications won't trip over
>      IPMP test address information, a synthetic EXPER_IP_AND_TESTHIDDEN
>      MIB level has been added.

This will remove information that used to show up in the MIB, and thus
cause a small loss of observability for IPMP machines managed by SNMP.

I think we should have ARC advice added to the opinion: management
needs to be advised that while this is an improvement in accuracy of
the data, it's also a regression, and that we need to have updates to
the SNMP implementation to support IPMP (perhaps via a private MIB).

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

Reply via email to