On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 03:32:13PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Nicolas Williams wrote: > >Sorry, what's the difference between "architecturally correct" and > >"end-user useful"? > > > >I don't see the difference. > *shrug*
Does that mean that you can't tell if there is a difference? Or that you don't care to share it? > >I don't see how looking at prof_attr(4) and deciding what profile each > >sg3 utility most naturally belongs to (or, if none seems appropriate, > >then creating new profiles as needed) is "so hard." > > > Perhaps not. So you don't know if it is or is not hard. However easy or hard it may be, you don't want anyone to have to do it. Is that right? > >You've gone from "geologic" to "a year," but you're still exagerating > >massively. > > Don 't think so. How do you square this with your "*shrug*" and "[p]erhaps not" quips? This thread is way too long already, but a) it's not a year-long, b) none of it proves anything about how hard or difficult it is to get RBAC right. On the contrary, it proves that there are engineers willing to help the i-team. [Alas, at this point I'm not helping the signal-to-noise ratio. So I'm moving this to opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org. I don't intend to continue this thread unless new information comes along though.] Nico --
