Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >> Garrett D'Amore wrote: > >>> Are you using (populating) anything in /usr/shell as part of this case? > >>> > >>> If not, you might consider running that as a separate fast track. > >> Without that portion, this case is pretty much an automatic-approval case > >> to upgrade to the latest upstream, but since the project team wanted to do > >> both at once, I saw no harm in having a combined fast track. > > > > Erm... since April don't have time to work on the code until Monday we > > can change the timeout to Friday (or Monday) ... > > PSARC decided today to let the original timer continue to run since the > case is still under discussion - that's running until Tuesday, June 3 > already - do you mean to extend it beyond that until Friday, June 6 or > Monday June 9?
I was thinking about Friday, 30.5.2008 to avoid making the codebase a "running target" for the code reviewers because the ARC case is not finished (Tuesday, 3.6.2008 is Ok, too... but that's IMO the upper limit since we're running into other timing issues). ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
