Stephen Hahn writes: > It would be a courtesy to the project team if ARC members could update > the issues file with their current concerns (or concerns they have not > yet written) by the end of the week. There are other projects > dependent on this case that have to examine their alternatives, if we > cannot come to a resolution in the neighbourhood the original > proposal.
I've added some issues to the file. Just to be clear about this: several members wanted to have this case derailed so that we could create a written opinion recording the precedent being set by this case. I'm just the one who stepped up (after much mumbling) to pull the derailment lever. We're aware that the other cases are all dependent on this one, which is why we derailed just this one and not the others. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
