Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 14:08 -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote: > >> The proposal already met the requirements of the no-third-party-setuid >> policy; >> > > there is no such policy. please don't make your and our job more > difficult by inventing additional policies for us to enforce. > Just to come to Stephen's defense, there was an example here. I'm hazy on the details, but I recall pushing back very hard on a proposed integration of a suid utility (one such utility in a proposed integration of many). I *think* I lost that argument.
Anyway, policy or not, there is precedence to show that proposing the integration of a FOSS suid utility will bring discussion. - jek3
