Marcel Telka wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:36 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote: >> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >>> On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:00 -0500, Kyle McDonald wrote: >>> >>>> I don't think emulating linux is worthwhile at all, but it seems that if >>>> that's what is deisre here, naming it /usr/linux might make more sense. >>>> >>> "Linux" is the name of a kernel. The command environment used by >>> Linux distributions is mostly GNU. >>> >>> Laca >>> >> A 'Linux Distribution' contains a linux kernel, and alot of software. >> Some of which is GNU. > > There is not something like THE Linux Distribution, so you could not > create something like /usr/linux. If you want to follow this schema you > should create something > like /usr/rh4, /usr/suse9, /usr/debian3, /usr/myown-nongnubased-linux-distro. > We probably do not want this :-).
One word: BrandZ -- Darren J Moffat
