Kyle McDonald wrote:
>> Do you remember the last time Rob went ballistic before he left?  It 
>> was over
>> login adding something to the users path.  After that rucus, I think 
>> this is a non-starter,
>> and should be.  We simply shouldn't muck with PATH.
> Is there a link to the discussion that ensued? I'd like to read it.
For the record, that's Rob Gingell who had an employee number in the low 
triple digits.  The
last title he held was Chief Engineer.  He left the company within the 
last year.

There isn't a formal e-mail discussion on this.  Suffice it to say that 
many customers complain
very loudly when we've mucked with the PATH on login.  A couple of years 
ago, one of
the special customers who had Scott McNealy's phone number called him 
about the (context
was cde).  The Rob "ballistic" was Gnome.  (Some actually thought that 
this event was
the straw that broke the camel's back as far as Rob leaving - not true, 
but it did catch him
when we was fairly grouchy.  I know all the details of this event, 
because I was the one
who made him aware of the issue.)

Anyway, suffice it to say, we can't even consider mucking with the 
user's setting of PATH.
Its a non-starter.

We can debate the other options tomorrow.

- jek3


Reply via email to